fdo-mirrors/mesa
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa.git synced 2026-05-07 04:58:05 +02:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 4

intel/peephole_fma: use nir_fp_no_contract instead of exact

Browse source 
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/40872>
This commit is contained in:
Georg Lehmann 2026-04-09 17:36:45 +02:00 • committed by Marge Bot
parent d2d86b83fb
commit 5231c924ea
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
src/intel/compiler/intel_nir_opt_peephole_ffma.c
View file

@ -50,13 +50,13 @@ get_mul_for_src(nir_alu_src *src, unsigned num_components,
nir_alu_instr *alu = nir_src_as_alu(src->src);
/* We want to bail if any of the other ALU operations involved is labeled
* exact. One reason for this is that, while the value that is changing is
* no-contract. One reason for this is that, while the value that is changing is
* actually the result of the add and not the multiply, the intention of
* the user when they specify an exact multiply is that they want *that*
* the user when they specify an no-contract multiply is that they want *that*
* value and what they don't care about is the add. Another reason is that
* SPIR-V explicitly requires this behaviour.
*/
if (!alu || nir_alu_instr_is_exact(alu))
if (!alu || nir_alu_instr_no_contract(alu))
return NULL;
switch (alu->op) {
@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ intel_nir_opt_peephole_ffma_instr(nir_builder *b,
if (add->op != nir_op_fadd)
return false;
if (nir_alu_instr_is_exact(add))
if (nir_alu_instr_no_contract(add))
return false;