radv: mark GFX10.3 as a non-conformant Vulkan implementation

In theory, GFX10.3 is not considered to be a conformant Vulkan
implementation because we didn't submit a conformance submission
package.

Cc: mesa-stable
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/7913>
(cherry picked from commit 5cacb56041)
This commit is contained in:
Samuel Pitoiset 2020-12-04 09:29:43 +01:00 committed by Dylan Baker
parent 44bed80506
commit 33c288361c
2 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions

View file

@ -166,7 +166,7 @@
"description": "radv: mark GFX10.3 as a non-conformant Vulkan implementation",
"nominated": true,
"nomination_type": 0,
"resolution": 0,
"resolution": 1,
"master_sha": null,
"because_sha": null
},

View file

@ -406,7 +406,8 @@ radv_physical_device_try_create(struct radv_instance *instance,
disk_cache_format_hex_id(buf, device->cache_uuid, VK_UUID_SIZE * 2);
device->disk_cache = disk_cache_create(device->name, buf, shader_env_flags);
if (device->rad_info.chip_class < GFX8)
if (device->rad_info.chip_class < GFX8 ||
device->rad_info.chip_class > GFX10)
fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: radv is not a conformant vulkan implementation, testing use only.\n");
radv_get_driver_uuid(&device->driver_uuid);