i965/blorp: Clarify why width/height must be adjusted for Gen6 IMS surfaces.

Also add a clarifying comment for why the width/height doesn't need
adjustment for Gen7.

NOTE: This is a candidate for stable release branches.

Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
This commit is contained in:
Paul Berry 2012-08-29 12:04:30 -07:00
parent bde833c9d0
commit 32c7b2769c
2 changed files with 10 additions and 1 deletions

View file

@ -415,7 +415,11 @@ gen6_blorp_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw,
uint32_t wm_surf_offset;
uint32_t width, height;
surface->get_miplevel_dims(&width, &height);
if (surface->num_samples > 1) { /* TODO: seems clumsy */
if (surface->num_samples > 1) {
/* Since gen6 uses INTEL_MSAA_LAYOUT_IMS, width and height are measured
* in samples. But SURFACE_STATE wants them in pixels, so we need to
* divide them each by 2.
*/
width /= 2;
height /= 2;
}

View file

@ -144,6 +144,11 @@ gen7_blorp_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw,
uint32_t wm_surf_offset;
uint32_t width, height;
surface->get_miplevel_dims(&width, &height);
/* Note: since gen7 uses INTEL_MSAA_LAYOUT_CMS or INTEL_MSAA_LAYOUT_UMS for
* color surfaces, width and height are measured in pixels; we don't need
* to divide them by 2 as we do for Gen6 (see
* gen6_blorp_emit_surface_state).
*/
if (surface->map_stencil_as_y_tiled) {
width *= 2;
height /= 2;