i965: Replace cpu_map pointers with a "use_shadow_copy" boolean.

Having a boolean for "we're using malloc'd shadow copies for all
buffers" is cleaner than having a cpu_map pointer for each.  It was
okay when we had one buffer, but this is more obvious.

Reviewed-by: Iago Toral Quiroga <itoral@igalia.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kenneth Graunke 2018-01-05 11:44:50 -08:00
parent 11674dad8a
commit 02c1c25b1a
2 changed files with 20 additions and 21 deletions

View file

@ -473,7 +473,6 @@ struct brw_reloc_list {
struct brw_growing_bo {
struct brw_bo *bo;
uint32_t *map;
uint32_t *cpu_map;
};
struct intel_batchbuffer {
@ -492,6 +491,7 @@ struct intel_batchbuffer {
uint32_t state_used;
enum brw_gpu_ring ring;
bool use_shadow_copy;
bool use_batch_first;
bool needs_sol_reset;
bool state_base_address_emitted;

View file

@ -83,12 +83,12 @@ intel_batchbuffer_init(struct brw_context *brw)
struct intel_batchbuffer *batch = &brw->batch;
const struct gen_device_info *devinfo = &screen->devinfo;
if (!devinfo->has_llc) {
batch->batch.cpu_map = malloc(BATCH_SZ);
batch->batch.map = batch->batch.cpu_map;
batch->use_shadow_copy = !devinfo->has_llc;
if (batch->use_shadow_copy) {
batch->batch.map = malloc(BATCH_SZ);
batch->map_next = batch->batch.map;
batch->state.cpu_map = malloc(STATE_SZ);
batch->state.map = batch->state.cpu_map;
batch->state.map = malloc(STATE_SZ);
}
init_reloc_list(&batch->batch_relocs, 250);
@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ intel_batchbuffer_reset(struct brw_context *brw)
batch->last_bo = batch->batch.bo;
batch->batch.bo = brw_bo_alloc(bufmgr, "batchbuffer", BATCH_SZ, 4096);
if (!batch->batch.cpu_map) {
if (!batch->use_shadow_copy) {
batch->batch.map =
brw_bo_map(brw, batch->batch.bo, MAP_READ | MAP_WRITE);
}
@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ intel_batchbuffer_reset(struct brw_context *brw)
batch->state.bo = brw_bo_alloc(bufmgr, "statebuffer", STATE_SZ, 4096);
batch->state.bo->kflags =
can_do_exec_capture(screen) ? EXEC_OBJECT_CAPTURE : 0;
if (!batch->state.cpu_map) {
if (!batch->use_shadow_copy) {
batch->state.map =
brw_bo_map(brw, batch->state.bo, MAP_READ | MAP_WRITE);
}
@ -243,8 +243,10 @@ intel_batchbuffer_reset_to_saved(struct brw_context *brw)
void
intel_batchbuffer_free(struct intel_batchbuffer *batch)
{
free(batch->batch.cpu_map);
free(batch->state.cpu_map);
if (batch->use_shadow_copy) {
free(batch->batch.map);
free(batch->state.map);
}
for (int i = 0; i < batch->exec_count; i++) {
brw_bo_unreference(batch->exec_bos[i]);
@ -284,7 +286,6 @@ static void
grow_buffer(struct brw_context *brw,
struct brw_bo **bo_ptr,
uint32_t **map_ptr,
uint32_t **cpu_map_ptr,
unsigned existing_bytes,
unsigned new_size)
{
@ -301,8 +302,8 @@ grow_buffer(struct brw_context *brw,
perf_debug("Growing %s - ran out of space\n", old_bo->name);
/* Copy existing data to the new larger buffer */
if (*cpu_map_ptr) {
*cpu_map_ptr = new_map = realloc(*cpu_map_ptr, new_size);
if (batch->use_shadow_copy) {
new_map = realloc(*map_ptr, new_size);
} else {
new_map = brw_bo_map(brw, new_bo, MAP_READ | MAP_WRITE);
memcpy(new_map, old_map, existing_bytes);
@ -373,7 +374,7 @@ intel_batchbuffer_require_space(struct brw_context *brw, GLuint sz,
MIN2(batch->batch.bo->size + batch->batch.bo->size / 2,
MAX_BATCH_SIZE);
grow_buffer(brw, &batch->batch.bo, &batch->batch.map,
&batch->batch.cpu_map, batch_used, new_size);
batch_used, new_size);
batch->map_next = (void *) batch->batch.map + batch_used;
assert(batch_used + sz < batch->batch.bo->size);
}
@ -806,14 +807,12 @@ submit_batch(struct brw_context *brw, int in_fence_fd, int *out_fence_fd)
struct intel_batchbuffer *batch = &brw->batch;
int ret = 0;
if (batch->batch.cpu_map) {
if (batch->use_shadow_copy) {
void *bo_map = brw_bo_map(brw, batch->batch.bo, MAP_WRITE);
memcpy(bo_map, batch->batch.cpu_map, 4 * USED_BATCH(*batch));
}
memcpy(bo_map, batch->batch.map, 4 * USED_BATCH(*batch));
if (batch->state.cpu_map) {
void *bo_map = brw_bo_map(brw, batch->state.bo, MAP_WRITE);
memcpy(bo_map, batch->state.cpu_map, batch->state_used);
bo_map = brw_bo_map(brw, batch->state.bo, MAP_WRITE);
memcpy(bo_map, batch->state.map, batch->state_used);
}
brw_bo_unmap(batch->batch.bo);
@ -1077,7 +1076,7 @@ brw_state_batch(struct brw_context *brw,
MIN2(batch->state.bo->size + batch->state.bo->size / 2,
MAX_STATE_SIZE);
grow_buffer(brw, &batch->state.bo, &batch->state.map,
&batch->state.cpu_map, batch->state_used, new_size);
batch->state_used, new_size);
assert(offset + size < batch->state.bo->size);
}