Device needs BTN_MIDDLE disabled, this way middle button emulation is present
by default.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The button-scroll by default behavior is only true on devices with a middle
button.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
And disable middle button emulation for this test, it would mess with the test
results.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
This failed on devices without a middle button, we just didn't have a test
device to trigger this.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
We don't have the same libevdev context that libinput has so if libinput
disables/enables event codes we don't see that and may get unexpected
behavior in the test.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
We don't initialize click methods on devices with physical buttons. This model
is a special case, it's not a clickpad but it only has one button (because one
button is all you ever need and whatnot).
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99283
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Usually we reply INVALID before we reply UNSUPPORTED but that's only for those
values where the value is a programming error. But in this case it's a bit
more complicated. INVALID is only for the cases where the button doesn't exist
on the device, if we don't have button scrolling at all then we have
UNSUPPORTED for all.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
They weren't originally prefixed but the various tests were, but now that we
only have one test runner binary anyway, the prefix helps sorting the files
easily within e.g. gcov results.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
