To quote Bryce Harrington from [1]:
"MIT has released software under several slightly different licenses,
including the old 'X11 License' or 'MIT License'. Some code under this
license was in fact included in X.org's Xserver in the past. However,
X.org now prefers the MIT Expat License as the standard (which,
confusingly, is also referred to as the 'MIT License'). See
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/tree/COPYING
When Wayland started, it was Kristian Høgsberg's intent to license it
compatibly with X.org. "I wanted Wayland to be usable (license-wise)
whereever X was usable." But, the text of the older X11 License was
taken for Wayland, rather than X11's current standard. This patch
corrects this by swapping in the intended text."
libinput is a fork of weston and thus inherited the original license intent
and the license boilerplate itself.
See this thread on wayland-devel here for a discussion:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2015-May/022301.html
[1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2015-June/022552.html
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
On touchpads with resolutions, use a 5mm motion threshold before we unpin the
finger (allow motion events while a clickpad button is down). This should
remove any erroneous finger movements while clicking, at the cost of having to
move the finger a bit more for a single-finger click-and-drag (use two fingers
already!)
And drop the finger drifting, it was per-event based rather than time-based.
So unless the motion threshold was hit in a single event it was possible to
move the finger around the whole touchpad without ever unpinning it.
Drop the finger drifting altogether, if the touchpad drifts by more than 5mm
we have other issues.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230462
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
A common use-case for clickfinger is to use the index finger for moving the
pointer, then triggering the click with a thumb. If the index finger isn't
lifted before the click this counted as two-finger click.
To avoid this, check the distance between touches on the touchpad (on
touchpads reporting resolution values anyway). If the touches are too far
apart, don't count them together (or specifically only count those close
enough together as multi-finger).
The touch area is uneven, it's wider than high. Spreading fingers horizontally
is more common and this also makes it easier to rule out thumbs which tend to
be well below the fingers.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90526
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
In the current code, a timeout or direction change on the first tracker will
result in a velocity of 0. Really slow movements will thus always be zero, and
the first event after a direction is swallowed.
Enforce a minimum velocity:
In the case of a timeout, assume the current velocity is that of
distance/timeout. In the case of a direction change, the velocity is simply
that since the last tracker.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The current code labels a touch as palm if it started within the typing
timeouts. To move the pointer even after the timeout expires, a user has to
lift the finger which is quite annoying and different to the old synaptics
driver behaviour (which had a simple on/off toggle on whether to let events
through or not).
Be smarter about this: if a touch starts _after_ the last key press event,
release it for pointer motion once the timeout expires. Touches started before
the last key press remain labelled as palms. This makes it possible to rest
the palm on the touchpad while typing without getting interference but also
provides a more responsive UI when moving from typing to using the touchpad
normally.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Check a couple of easy yes/no definitives that cover most Lenovo laptops,
and avoid false positives on Wacoms.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
The litest-selftest has its own main method and compiles litest.c with special
flags. Use that to ifdef out the litest.c main function, and inline the
litest_run/litest_parse_args functions so gcc doesn't complain about unused
functions.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Unlikely, but there's the odd chance of the first touch coming in with the
same X or Y coordinate the kernel already has internally. This would
generate a bogus delta on the second event when the touch coordinate jumps
from 0/y or x/0 to the real coordinates.
For touchpads with distance support this is a real issue since the default
value for a touch distance is > 0.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Tested-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
When the device supports true hovering, it reports this
information through ABS_MT_DISTANCE.
When this axis is available, we should rely on it to
(un)hover the touches as BTN_TOUCH is most of the time
unreliable (generated by the mouse emulation in the kernel).
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The current hover tests are uniquely designed for some Synaptics
touchpad. libinput can handle hovering through ABS_MT_DISTANCE,
so we need to reserve the "hover" name for real hovering devices.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Prep work for the upcoming patch to extend the timeout for tap-and-drag. And
switch the tests that rely on it over to the new function.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Released the wrong touch point, causing warnings:
libevdev error in sanitize_event: BUG: Device "litest SynPS/2 Synaptics
TouchPad" received a double tracking ID 6 in slot 0.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Some semi-mt model touchpads have a better accuracy for slot 0 then for
slot 1 (they only have 2), so on semi-mt models only use the movement of
the touch in slot 0 for 2fg scrolling, rather then the average movement of
the 2 touches.
This fixes 2fg scrolling being choppy / jumpy in some cases.
BugLink: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89683
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Also needed: change the touchpad scroll source test to use more separate
events. The current litest semi-mt touch implementation only moves the first
touch on every second move. With 5 movements this isn't enough to fill the
motion history and generate events, so double it to 10 so we're guaranteed to
get scroll events.
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
On the Logitech T650 it's quite easy to trigger a click without touching the
surface. For software buttons we discard those clicks because we can't tell
where the finger is to decide on left vs right click.
It takes effort to trigger a click with two fingers without triggering a touch
though, so in clickfinger mode post a click without touches as single-finger
click.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90150
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Unlike all the other 2fg scroll tests the touchpad_edge_scroll_no_2fg test
puts the 2 fingers down quite far apart, this makes the pinch vs scroll
gesture detection code in the gestures branch detect a pinch causing the
test to fail.
This commit brings the finger placement in line with the other 2fg scroll
tests fixing this.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The goal of this test is to make sure that the deltas are less than 5, which
is the scroll trigger for movement-based edge scrolling. The litest suite
takes percentages of the device, so use a scale factor to change how far we
move on the tablet. The wacom tablet is 141mm, the movement must be smaller to
provide small-enough deltas.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The single finger requirement dates back to when we couldn't configure the
scroll method. Now we can, so let's run the tests on as many suitable devices
as possible.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Just to make sure it is enabled (it should be anyway).
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Once we have a doubletap, enter a loop in the state machine where we can tap
multiple times and either get a multi-click or a multi-click drag-and-drop.
The sequence down/up down/up down/up produces a triple-click. The sequence
down/up down/up down/up down produces a triple-click with a button down for
dragging. Yes, that glorious octuple-tap-and-drag, it is now possible. World
domination has been achieved, thank you for playing.
We don't know when we finish tapping now, so add a timeout to send the last
click event once the finger has been released for the last time. This
guarantees that the timestamp of the last button down is later than the
last release. This avoids the bug fixed in synaptics commit
xf86-input-synaptics-1.8.0-21-g37d34f0 (some application don't handle
doubletap correctly without the timestamps).
This works for double-tap immediately, for multi-tap we need to remember the
timestamp of the first press event and use it for the release event so that
there's a forced gap between the release and the second press.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89511
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
This is just the required framework, it's not hooked up to anything just yet.
Hooking it up comes as separate commit to better detail why/when a device
supports emulation.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209753 lists a touchpad 76mm wide
that suffers from palm touches
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Touches in the exclusion zone are ignored for palm detection and don't move
the cursor. Tapping however triggers before we know whether something is a
palm or not, so we get erroneous button clickst.
If a tap happens in the top half of the touchpad, within the palm exclusion
zones, ignore it for tap purposes. To avoid further complicating the state
machine simply pretend there was a movement > threshold on that finger. This
advances the tap state machine properly that no button events are sent for
this finger.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89625
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
tp->nfingers_down gives us the current state of the touchpad but in the case
of the tapping state we need the touchpoints separately. If all touchpoints
end in the same SYN_REPORT frame, tp->nfingers_down is 0 when we handle the
touch releases. This changes the tap state to IDLE on the first release and
then logs a bug when the remaining touches are released while the touchpad is
in IDLE.
Avoid this by counting the fingers separately for the tap state, this way we
can count up/down with the down/up events as we process them for the tapping
state machine.
This also adds tests for 4 and 5-finger tapping which is how the bug was
discovered in the first place.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89800
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The current default start location for the 2fg scroll tests: 47%, 50% and
53%, 50% are further than 3cm apart on the wacom-intuos-finger test device,
causing test failures when pinch gesture support gets added.
This fixes this, and also switches the fingers in the
touchpad_2fg_scroll_slow_distance and touchpad_trackpoint_buttons_2fg_scroll
tests to the default locations rather than putting them pretty far apart.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Currently all the touchpad 2fg tests move the 2 fingers 1 at a time,
causing a finger motion which looks more like a pinch zoom in followed by
a zoom out than an actual 2fg scroll gesture. Add a helper function which
can move 2 fingers at the same time (more or less), and use this where
relevant.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Currently touchpad_2fg_scroll_slow_distance always moves the touches 10% of
the touchpad height during the test.
On the wacom-intuos-finger test device this is a much larger distance then on
the synaptics test device, triggering ck_assert(axisval < 5.0) errors with
further patches in this set, this commit fixes this.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The previous setting of 10 wasn't 10 mm, it was used against the deltas
normalized to a 1000DPI mouse, i.e. closer to 4mm. It was also also per-event,
so a slow movement or a high-frequency touchpad can struggle to meet the
threshold.
Change the trigger to be ~5 mm from the initial touch down, accumulated until
we either meet the threshold or the timeout expires. The first scroll event
includes the delta since the touch down rather than the most recent delta.
This removes the delay otherwise seen in scrolling and makes the scroll motion
match the finger motion. This accumulated delta only applies when exceeding
the motion threshold, when the timeout triggers the switch to scrolling the
first delta posted is the current delta.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
On a semi-mt device lifting slot 0 before slot 1 makes slots 1 become slot 0
(with the matching coordinate jump), potentially triggering the tap movement
threshold.
On one test we can just swap the release order, the other test we need to
disable (the _inverted version of this test tests the other order anyway).
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
This affects the touch device on graphics tablets.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Works as a touchpad but has no buttons.
Minor change to one of the touchpad tests: because the touch area is so big
the slow-scrolling trigger needs to be adjusted.
And because the device is an external device, the "disable on external mouse"
test needs to be adjusted.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
These tests make sure we don't get tapping events in certain situations
(finger movement, timeouts, ...). Tapping must be enabled for that to be a
valid test.
The tests can't work on semi-mt devices because we can't end slots
independently. Disable the tests there.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
If we send BTN_LEFT or similar, we need the LITEST_BUTTON capability on the
device.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Split out into a btntool test and a true three-finger test. For consistency,
check the number of slots on all those tests rather than having
litest-device-specific exclusions.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
No effect, all devices currently have tapping disabled.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The event sequences we use for plam detection trigger tap events if enabled by
default. Always disable tapping, a set of tests for tapping in the palm
exclusion zones. Arguably, tapping in the zones should be handled in a
separate set of tests though.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
