The struct input_event is not y2038 safe.
Update the struct according to the kernel patch:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/6/324
Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Too many touches are unreliable with 2+ fingers down and we should error on
the side of not detecting wobbling.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If we get an event other than a motion event we're not wobbling so we need to
reset and restart.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Otherwise we may detect wobble despite having a series of valid y movements,
e.g. the following sequence was detected as wobble:
x: 1 y: 0
x: 0 y: 1
x: 0 y: 2
x: 0 y: 2
x: 0 y: 1
x: -1 y: 0
x: 1 y: 0
Avoid this by resetting the history when we get a dx == 0 event. It'll take
longer for real wobble to be detected but it reduces the number of false
positives.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This makes it possible for callers to detect whether a touch device is
single or multitouch (or even check for things like dual-touch vs real
multi-touch) and adjust the interface accordingly.
Note that this is for touch devices only, not touchpads that are just pointer
devices.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104867
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Introduced in 416fa44d80 but there was a logic
error: we claimed to require 3 events from a trackpoint before stopping the
touchpad but the timer was only set when we actually stopped the touchpad. So
if a trackpoint sends a single event every second, we'd disable the touchpad
after 3 seconds for the duration of the timeout, then again 3 seconds later,
etc.
Fix this by always setting the timeout and resetting the event counter if no
activity happened.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This adds a third profile to the available profiles to map device-specific
speed to an acceleration factor, fully defined by the caller.
There has been a consistent call for different acceleration profiles in
libinput, but very little specifics in what actually needs to be changed.
"faster horses" and whatnot (some notable exceptions in e.g. bug 101139).
Attempts to change the actual acceleration function will likely break things
for others.
This approach opens up the profile itself to a user-specific acceleration
curve. A caller can set an acceleration curve by defining a number of points
on that curve to map input speed to an output factor. That factor is applied
to the input delta.
libinput does relatively little besides mapping the deltas to the
device-specific speed, querying the curve for that speed and applying that
factor. The curve is device-specific, the input speed is in device units/ms.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Don't apply any velocity diff checking on the first two events, always average
them (unless the timeout is hit or the direction changes). This averages out
some of the jumps we get on slow motion.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Two fingers on the touchpad, they're 40x40mm apart, that's a pinch. But only
after a timeout because we don't want to start a 2fg gesture if the user puts
down the third/fourth finger within the next few ms.
Related to: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99830
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Instead of a scroll wheel these mice feature trackpoint-like sticks which
generate a huge amount of scroll events that need to be handled differently
than scroll wheel events.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ganzhorn <peter.ganzhorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This device randomly decides that a touch is now a palm, based on
the moon phase, the user's starsign and possibly what the dog had for
breakfast. Since libinput assumes that a touchpad that labels a touch as palm
has reasons to do so, let's unassume this for this device by disabling that
axis altogether and relying on the touch pressure only.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565692
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Semi-MT devices provide a bounding box of the fingers, and internally we don't
treat them as real MT device. Depending which finger currently provides
ABS_X/Y we may get a large jump when the other finger is released.
Basic sequence is finger 1 down, finger 2 down, finger 1 up.
On the last interaction, the ABS_X/Y which was on finger 1's coordinates now
jumps to finger 2's coordinates. This is interpreted as movement by the
tapping code, resulting in missed two-finger taps.
Ignore these movements on semi-mt devices.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105043
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Yeah, it's duplication. But this way it's also separation and we can't
accidentally use the wrong struct.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Plenty of duplication there from the normal filter.c, but that also makes it
less likely to break if we adjust the other one.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This also fixes a bug with the _noop function, because we casted to the wrong
struct the dpi value was garbage.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is the standard approach for mice and touchpads to calculate the
acceleration based on the last two deltas, let's make that code shareable.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
There's a fair bit of duplication of code from filter.c but it's not worth
disecting this and optimising it. The device is 5 years old now, we don't want
to touch this accel method so duplication is good here.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This way we can pass them around easier without needing the whole
pointer_accelerator struct (which in theory is device-type specific). The
values relate to the calculation of the delta between trackers anyway, so
logically this is where they belong.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
When the X1 Yoga is in tablet mode, one capacitative touch button (windows
key, sends KEY_LEFTMETA) and two side volume buttons are accessible on the
front. The key event comes through the internal keyboard that we disabled in
tablet mode so it stops working.
Luckily the Yoga physically disables the "main" keyboard when in tablet mode,
so all we have to do is skip our code to disable the keyboard and the keys are
working again.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103749
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is an external keyboard+touchpad but not recognised as touchpad by the
kernel so it's in mouse emulation mode. Double-taps are sent with impossibly
close timestamps and filtered out by the debouncing code. Since this isn't a
real button that can wear out anyway, let's just disable debouncing on this
device.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105974
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If we get to this point, we've already ruled out invalid arguments and this
shouldn't really fail, so let's reply with UNSUPPORTED instead.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
edit: Luckily there's no overlap between the users of those two flags so this
didn't trigger any bugs.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If a touch is in TOUCH_NONE, there is nothing to see here, please move along.
In the case of bug 105696, we were accessing the speed.exceeded_count of a
touch that was released previously, erroneously detecting a speed-based thumb.
The sequence was:
- touch down in slot 0, speed.exceeded_count is reset to 0
- move touch until exceeded_count is greater than our threshold
- touch up in slot 0
- touch down in slot 1 [1]
- touch down in slot 2 (more than 25mm away)
- we counted the slot 0 speed.exceeded_count, labeling the slot 2 touch as
speed-based thumb
[1] peculiar behavior only observed on this device, usually slots get re-used
at the first opportunity so having an inactive slot followed by higher slots
being used is unusual.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105696
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
During libinput initialization a list of existing input devices is
retrieved from udev. This can lead to a situation where libinput can
end up processing un-configured devices because of the race generated
by udev events and libinput startup.
Sequence example:
weston - start
udev - device 1 added
weston - get a list of input devices
weston - process device 1 -- undefined behavior
udev - device 1 added - finalized
The problem was found because of incorrect touchscreen association
when in a dual monitor system the secondary touchscreen was
incorrectly associated with output one since udev didn't finish the
device initialization and WL_OUTPUT was missing.
To avoid this situation we skip un-configured devices during libinput
initialization, relying on udev to send events when devices are
fully configured.
Note: due to the peculiarities of udev_device_get_is_initialized(), the
input device is still processed if the call fails. If there are no udev
rules defined for the device, it will never be reported as initialized,
but this is not a problem, because all input devices handled by libinput
must have some udev properties set, therefore they always have rules.
Signed-off-by: Nandor Han <nandor.han@ge.com>
[Pekka: change log to debug, unref device]
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
