Incorrect comment, the purpose of this test was to ensure that an unused slot
doesn't affect how other touches are treated, see commit 928bad9.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Got papered over by bugs in the implementation and didn't trigger the jump
detection or movement detection otherwise.
Related to #578
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
So we don't need to worry about the libgen.h include game.
And we can switch trunkname over to that, making it a bit simpler.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Same as after a tap, just with a short drag between tap and 2/3 finger movement.
Also fixes a finger coord typo in one of the previously added test cases.
Signed-off-by: satrmb <10471-satrmb@users.noreply.gitlab.freedesktop.org>
We have two behaviors here:
- tap + 2fg -> scrolling
- tap + 1fg move + 2f down -> dragging
Let's document this. The 3fg case only has one situation, so let's test that.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This was just there to avoid unused variable warnings but the simpler approach
to that is to just not assign a variable in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
These had no consequences apart from occasional "system is too slow" messages,
because the test suite's shorter tap timeout is just barely long enough
for drag-lock, and/or because litest_assert_button_event waits for an event
anyway.
Signed-off-by: satrmb <10471-satrmb@users.noreply.gitlab.freedesktop.org>
This only affects the actual dragging part of the tap-and-drag interaction;
n-finger tap-and-drag is supposed to be performed with a n-finger tap
followed by a 1-finger drag.
Allowing a second finger in the middle of a drag is still necessary for a
finger swap, which users may need in long-distance drags, especially when
drag-lock is disabled.
Signed-off-by: satrmb <10471-satrmb@users.noreply.gitlab.freedesktop.org>
Some users reported problems triggering multi-finger tap-and-drag,
with reliability decreasing as the finger count increased.
This is plausible because they may shift towards moving the whole hand
up and down, which obviously takes more time than just a finger.
Signed-off-by: satrmb <10471-satrmb@users.noreply.gitlab.freedesktop.org>
The group names are forced by check (they are called suite names there) but
for our test suite they provide very little benefit. Much easier to just
use the filename a test is in as group name.
This removes the pure substring match for --filter-group, it's now fnmatch
only. group names are short enough that the typing isn't an issue and we don't
want to run tests twice (e.g. 'pad' is also in 'touchpad').
This patch caused #574 until it got fixed in d838e3a3a4
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Using buttons for this test can trigger debounce warnings instead (in
addition?) to the warning we actually check for. Let's use motion events
instead and double the loop while we're at it so we have double the chance of
triggering at least one warning.
Fixes#574 for unknown reasons
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
litest itself requires the libinput user_data to be set to its own context
struct (see close_restricted). A test that needs its own user_data must not
override this struct - if the context is accessed during libinput_dispatch()
we'll get memory corruption.
See #574
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The kernel/udev set the pressure resolution to nonzero to indicate the value
is in a known scale (units/g). We use that information to disable the
pressure axis on such devices - real pressure cannot be translated to
contact size.
For the kernel patch see:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-input/msg71237.htmlFixes#569
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This touchpad is a true pressurepad and the pressure axis gives us physical
pressure down. Using it as contact size gives flaky touch detection, so let's
just disable the axis until we do something with that value.
Fixes#562
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Data in
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libinput/libinput/-/issues/225#note_379034
suggests that AES devices have lower noise than the older EMR
devices, so let's try disabling it for those devices.
We can't directly get the AES devices in libinput unless we want to add a
whole bunch of quirks for the various vid/pid combinations. But we can get
that info from libwacom, primarily because we know that libwacom will list all
known AES pens for any device. So we can check for one that we know of (0x11)
and if it's in the list, the tablet is an AES tablet.
Setting the history size to 1 means we never do any actual smoothing.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
All minor:
- execdir does not need initialization, it's not used until written to
- 'newest' could be NULL
- zalloc(-1) confuses coverity
- 't' is never used in that test
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The latter requires libevdev 1.10 but since that'll take a while to filter
into our various CI systems, let's make it conditional.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Currently unused, but let's get this in because we may need this very soon for
broken tablets.
Enabling EV_ABS axes requires an absinfo struct - we default to a simple 0-1
axis range for those as the most generic option. Anything more custom will
need more custom treatment when we need it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Only worked because of axis smoothing mangling the coordinates - x is not
supposed to change where we're moving along a vertical line. And the same for
y and horizontal lines.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This test only worked because axis smoothing mangled the coordinates, moving
from 5/10 to 10/20 cannot possibly have a dx of zero.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This covers the addition of two- and three-finger tap-and-drag,
as well as the fix for multitaps with more than one finger in later taps
and the multifinger enhancement to the tap ending drag-lock.
Signed-off-by: satrmb <10471-satrmb@users.noreply.gitlab.freedesktop.org>
This commit duplicates the tap states responsible for tap-and drag (TAPPED
and all DRAGGING* states) to cover two-finger and three-finger taps;
the code for the new states is shared with the existing machinery for
one-finger tap-and-drag.
Signed-off-by: satrmb <10471-satrmb@users.noreply.gitlab.freedesktop.org>
This is the device from
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libinput/libinput/-/issues/259 which sets
BTN_TOOL_PEN in addition to the real tool. Integrate this into the test device
proper so it always does this to catch various outliers.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
More realistic, there's no way you can get the x/y coordinates exactly the
same when moving the pen back into prox.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The current tool type test merely sends BTN_TOOL_RUBBER (and others) manually
and expects libinput to do the right thing. This only tests the perfect
sequence but not test weird devices that behave differently on a tool type
switch.
So let's fix this by setting the tool type as property on the libinput test
device itself, and then emulate the tool switch through litest.
For special devices this will need extra callbacks, this is just the initial
framework to handle those buttons.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This test only worked because we're emulating events that the device never
sends that way. Just skip the test, devices that require a forced prox out
probably don't handle (or even have) erasers ayway.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
SW_MAX changed and the device_capability_nocaps_ignored test will fail on
older kernels. Change that test to use some other unhandled-by-libinput switch
code instead.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This used to do nothing, now at least it does the same thing as the
corresponding keyboard test. It merely tests the switch going on/off while a
touchpad is present, so short of an unexpected error message or a crash this
test doesn't actually test for any specific behavior.
Fixes#502
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
No effect on the test results because we never use ABS_Y anyway for multitouch
devices.
Fixes#505
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Putting an EVIOCGRAB on the device before sending those events means no-one
else sees those events - particularly upower. This means no-one else knows the
lid is on or off and thus we never blank the screen (or suspend/shut down but
those are inhibited anyway).
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
