Once we trigger diagonal scrolling, the device's scroll direction is set as
horiz+vert. From then on, both axes will be set on every subsequent scroll
event, even when the actual delta for an axis is 0.
This causes continuous scroll stop events in clients that care about these
things.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
If all fingers are released in the same frame, we won't be able to find the
top-most touch.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93204
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
This test is supposed to test for the timeout kicking in on edge scrolling -
if the finger is in the edge for longer than the timeout, we switch to
scrolling without requiring the motion threshold to be met first.
To emulate this, move the finger ever so slightly first to load up the motion
history, then timeout, then move. We expect a bunch of motion events with a
small delta.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Makes the code more straightforward, and we now require the devices to
have a height/width anyway.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Instead of going straight to pointer_notify_axis, go through
evdev_notify_axis() which flips the scroll direction around for us.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91597
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The first finger is accurate, it's just the second finger that is imprecise,
so we can't handle it as a true touch. Instead, revert the device back to
being a single-touch touchpad and use the fake touch bits for second finger
handling.
Two-finger scrolling thus becomes usable though we will lose out on
other features like thumb detection. Useful scrolling trumps that though.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
98346f6a1a added a warning about timeouts expiring before now. Those warnings
are triggered by a bunch of tests where we have events, then a timeout, then a
libinput_dispatch().
All these are bugs in the test, since we can't guarantee the order of fds (and
thus which fd the events are pulled off first) it's just lucky that they worked.
Insert the required libinput_dispatch() calls.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
In order to provide higher precision event time stamps, change the
internal time measuring from milliseconds to microseconds.
Microseconds are chosen because it is the most fine grained time stamp
we can get from evdev.
The API is extended with high precision getters whenever the given
information is available.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
These touchpads have a terrible resolution when two fingers are down, causing
scrolling to jump around a lot. That then turns into bug reports that we can't
do much about, the data is simply garbage.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91135
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
If a thumb moves around, it's not resting and we should consider it a normal
touch.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
That's the most likely area it will be resting in, if it's sitting anywhere
above that it's likely part of an interaction.
A thumb in the lowest 15mm needs to trigger the pressure threshold before it's
labelled a thumb. A thumb in the lowest 8mm is considered a thumb if it
remains there for 300ms. Regardless of the pressure, since we can't reliably
get pressure here. If a thumb moves out of the area, or starts outside of that
area it is never a thumb.
If edge scrolling is enabled, the 8mm threshold is ineffective since we'll
have normal interaction in that zone for horizontal scrolling.
The thumb tests now require all touchpads to be switched to clickfinger, if we
test for thumb detection on the bottom of the pad we won't get expected
motion events due to the software button area.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
This is not a frequent toggle, so we don't need to jump through too many hoops
here. We simply enable/disable on command and once any current timeouts have
expired the new setting takes effect.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
We're again hitting the fork ulimits again (see also 9c2afae14) causing test
case failures in the valgrind run of the touchpad test.
Split out the touchpad button tests so we don't require special ulimits on
test boxes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
When the touch leaves the area for edge scrolling after starting to scroll,
discard any movement. This signals to the user that they've left the area and
forces them to lift the finger to switch back to motion. If the finger moves
back into the area, scrolling continues.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91323
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
edge scrolling disables some palm detection, so we can't run those tests when
active. That fell through the cracks so far, all devices with edge scroll by
default were too small to enable palm detection.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
On the synaptics hover device where this test is run, we'd eventually get into
the edge scroll zone. When edge scrolling is enabled this causes the test to
fail.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Synatics touchpads only have 2 slots, but support TRIPLETAP and above. When
the third finger touches, the kernel may end the second slot and re-start it
with the coordinates of the third touch in the next frame. The event sequence
is something like:
ABS_MT_SLOT 0
ABS_MT_POSITION_X 4000
ABS_MT_POSITION_Y 4000
ABS_MT_PRESSURE 78
ABS_MT_SLOT 1
ABS_MT_TRACKING_ID -1
ABS_X 4000
ABS_Y 4000
ABS_PRESSURE 78
BTN_TOOL_DOUBLETAP 0
BTN_TOOL_TRIPLETAP 1
--- SYN_REPORT (0) ----------
ABS_MT_SLOT 0
ABS_MT_POSITION_X 4000
ABS_MT_POSITION_Y 4000
ABS_MT_PRESSURE 78
ABS_MT_SLOT 1
ABS_MT_TRACKING_ID 55
ABS_MT_POSITION_X 2000
ABS_MT_POSITION_Y 2000
ABS_MT_PRESSURE 72
ABS_X 4000
ABS_Y 4000
ABS_PRESSURE 78
--- SYN_REPORT (0) ----------
libinput usually ignores any BTN_TOOL_* <= num_slots since we expect
that the slot values are valid. Make an exception for the serial synaptics
touchpads. If a touch has ended when the fake touch goes above active-slots
(but still within num-slots), move that touch back to UPDATE. This ensures the
right number of nfingers_down. When the touch restarts again in the next
frame, tp_begin_touch() will skip over re-initializing it because it's already
in UPDATE anyway.
Note that at this point this only handles the transition _to_ TRIPLETAP, not
from TRIPLETAP to DOUBLETAP. Need to wait for this to be seen in the wild
first.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91352
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Hallelujah-expressed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
On touchpads with a higher resolution we also see higher pressure values.
Scale accordingly, but use the T440s as reference and don't go below that
device's threshold. A false positive is worse than a false negative when it
comes to thumb detection.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91362
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The average human hand has four fingers but only one thumb, i.e. the chance of
a fake finger being close to the top-most touch is higher than to whatever the
first touch was (which may be a thumb at the bottom of the touchpad).
So search for the top-most real touch and copy its position into the fake
touches.
This also fixes another bug with the previous code - the first slot may not be
active but we still used its position for the fake touches. Whether that was
really triggerable is questionable though.
The test is only run for the T440 touchpad - we know it's big enough to
enable thumb detection and that way we don't have to double-check in the how
big the touchpad is, etc.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
We may have four fingers on the touchpad - three real ones + a thumb. Count it
as three-finger click then.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The use-case we have thumb detection for is to let a user rest a thumb on the
touchpad before clicking. On a touchpad with physical buttons, the thumb won't
be resting on the touchpad.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Gets a bit cramped if you're trying to rest the thumb on a touchpad that
small.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
3mm is too large, it makes the touchpad feel sluggish. We already take fuzz
into account through the hysteresis and the real issue we have with the
pointer moving on a click is _before_ the BTN_LEFT event comes in, not after.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Watching a colleague try clickfinger right-click after enabling it the first
time showed that the vertical distance is too small. Increase it to 30mm
instead.
Increase the allowed spread between fingers to 40x30mm, but check if one of
the fingers is in the bottom-most 20mm of the touchpad. If that's the case,
and the touchpad is large enough to be feasable for resting a thumb on it,
discard the finger for clickfinger count.
If both fingers are in that area or one finger is in the area and they're
really close together, the fingers count separately and are not regarded as
thumb.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91046
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Makes the test code easier to read. In tests where we explicitly check the API
the real calls were left in place.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
No functional changes, just so we can group those helpers together.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Implement touchpad pinch (and rotate) gesture support.
Note that two two-finger scrolling tests are slightly tweaked to assure that
there is enough touch movement to allow the scroll-or-pinch detect code to do
its work.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jason Gerecke <jason.gerecke@wacom.com>
No functional change, other than that we check for status codes now too.
In tests that don't specifically check the interface itself, a short
enable_tap() or disable_tap() is a lot more obvious to parse for the reader.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Most scroll motions would be labelled a palm.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90980
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
