A touchpad that was disabled by toggling the sendevents option would come back
normally after a lid resume, despite still being nominally disabled.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448962
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
On some devices with a tablet mode switch, the touchpad is inacessible when
in tablet mode and we don't really need this except to avoid possible ghost
touches (none have been mentioned so far). On other devices like the Lenovo
Yoga, the touchpad points to the back of the device and it's hard to use the
device without accidentally using the touchpad. For those, disabling the
touchpad is the best solution.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102408
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This was originally designed to deal with devices that only have SW_LID. But
it can be moved into the evdev interface to avoid duplication once we have
SW_TABLET_MODE. The original assumption of the lid switch device being a
standalone device with no other switches is not true, having a separate
dispatch hurts us here.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
More in line with other tests and allows us to use 'sw' as name for the actual
switch to be toggled later. The variable name 'sw' stays in those tests where
we have touchpad/keyboard/etc. devices as well.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Calculate the speed of the touch and compare it against a fixed speed limit.
If a touch exceeds the speed when a second touch is set down, that second
touch is marked as a thumb and ignored (unless it's right next to the other
finger, then it's likely a 2fg scroll).
The speed calculation is simple but has to lag behind by one sample - we reset
the motion history whenever a new finger is set down (to avoid pointer jumps)
so we need to know if the finger was moving fast *before* this happens. Plus,
with the pointer jumps we're more likely to get false positives if we
calculate the speed on actual finger down.
This is the simplest version for now, the speed varies greatly between
movements and should probably be averaged across the last 3-or-so samples.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99703
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Devices tagged as accelerometers may also be other devices like tablet pads.
Only ignore pure accelerometer devices but disable the accelerometer axes for
devices that have multiple types.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102100
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gerecke <jason.gerecke@wacom.com>
The current tests worked because all rings had the same range, so our error
margin covered for that. With the upcoming MobileStudio Pro 16 pad device, the
range is half and our error margins don't work anymore. Switch to a more
reliable approach that tests every integer value the wheel can send, even
though it relies on kernel filtering.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The recommended way to have libinput ignore specific devices so far was to
remove the ID_INPUT* properties from the device. That may also affect other
pieces of the stack that need access to this device.
For the niche case of a device that should only be ignored by libinput but
otherwise be treated normally by the system, we now support the
LIBINPUT_IGNORE_DEVICE property.
If the property is set to "0", it's equivalent to being unset. This gets
around some technical limitations in udev where unsetting a property is
impossible via a hwdb entry.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102229
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
And make it init the full litest device minus the libinput device. This
enables us to add litest devices that aren't handled by libinput.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We don't know the position of the third finger on 2-slot touchpads, differing
between swipe and pinch is reliable. Simply disable 3-finger pinch and always
use swipe; 3fg pinch is uncommon anyway and it's better to have one of the
gestures working reliably than both unreliably.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The lid dispatch interface is a one-trick pony and can only handle SW_LID. It
ignores other switches but crashes on any event type other than EV_SW and
EV_SYN. Disable those types so we just ignore the event instead of asserting.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101853
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gerecke <jason.gerecke@wacom.com>
Some devices have worn-out switches or just cheap switches that trigger
multiple button events for each press. These can be identified by unfeasably
short time deltas between the release and the next press event. In the
recordings I've seen so far, that timeout is 8ms.
We have a two-stage behavior: by default, we do not delay any events but we
monitor timestamps. The first time a bouncing button is detected we switch to
debounce mode. From then on, release events are delayed slightly to check for
subsequent button events. If one occurs, the releas and press are filtered. If
none occurs, the release event is passed to the caller.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100057
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If the kernel sends us a button press for a button that is thought to be down
we have lost track of the state of the button. Ignore the button press event,
in the hope that the next release makes things right again.
A release event may be masked if another process grabs the device for some
period of time, e.g. libinput debug-events --grab.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101796
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Switch to a pure factor with a max scaled after a function. The offset is just
0 now (will be removed eventually). Both are determined with a function based
on a linear/exponential regression of a sample set of data pairs.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
There's no guarantee that libinput does the right thing if memory allocation
fails and it's such a niche case on the systems we're targeting that it just
doesn't matter. Simply abort if zalloc ever fails.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Apple touchpads don't use ABS_MT_PRESSURE but they are multitouch touchpads,
so the current pressure-based handling code doesn't apply because it expects
slot-based pressure for mt touchpads.
Apple does however send useful data for ABS_MT_WIDTH_MAJOR/MINOR, so let's use
that instead. The data provided in those is more-or-less random, so we need a
hwdb entry to track the acceptable thresholds.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The max values on ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR/MINOR aren't hard limits, they basically
represent the size of a finger with (afaict) a suggestion that anything
greater than the max may be a palm. Disable the 0-100% range checks for those
axes so we can send custom events.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If the keyboard is removed while dwt thinks it is in active state, that state
is never reset and subsequent touches are ignored.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101743
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Uninitialized variables, potential NULL dereferences, dead assignments and an
unused return value.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This reduces unexpected cursor moves when placing the thumb near the border
of trackpoint buttons and upper edge of touchpad.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101574
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Already done in main(), this here is a leftover from having multiple mains fro
different tests.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This was useful when we had a small number of test-forks with the suites
distributed. It helped debug which one is still running and then which suites
are in it. Now that we simply distributed everything across the forks it
doesn't have a lot of usefulness and it interferes with the ability to
backtrace properly.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Broken since the merge of palm pressure detection in
25d54b90d, not sure why the test suite succeeded on that one nonetheless.
I'm not 100% sure why the test does what it does but it seems to be testing
that a wide touch on the side still striggers edge scrolling and not the thumb
detection on the bottom of the touchpad. That is obsolete now, it's hard to
generically figure out the small gap between thumb and palm pressure, so this
test almost always triggers palm detection. It's obsolete.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
