This reduces unexpected cursor moves when placing the thumb near the border
of trackpoint buttons and upper edge of touchpad.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101574
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Broken since the merge of palm pressure detection in
25d54b90d, not sure why the test suite succeeded on that one nonetheless.
I'm not 100% sure why the test does what it does but it seems to be testing
that a wide touch on the side still striggers edge scrolling and not the thumb
detection on the bottom of the touchpad. That is obsolete now, it's hard to
generically figure out the small gap between thumb and palm pressure, so this
test almost always triggers palm detection. It's obsolete.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
If a touch goes past the fixed pressure threshold it is labelled as a palm and
stays a palm. Default value is one that works well here on a T440 and is
virtually impossible to trigger by a normal finger or thumb. A udev property
is exposed so we can handle this in the udev hwdb and the new tool introduce a
few commits ago can help finding the palm detection threshold.
Unlike the other palm detection features, once a palm goes past the threshold
it remains a palm until the touch is released. This means palm overrides any
other palm detection features. For code simplicity, we don't combine the
states but merely check for pressure before and after the other palm detection
functions. If the pressure triggers, it will trigger before anything else. And
if something else is already active (e.g. edge where the pressure doesn't work
well) it will trigger as soon as the palm is released.
The palm threshold should thus be chosen with some room to spare between the
highest finger pressure.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94236
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This was originally left outside of the button areas in case users tap in
those zones, but we're getting false tap events in that zone.
On a 100mm touchpad, the edge zone is merely 5mm, it's acceptable to ignore
taps in that area even in the software button. We can revisit this if we see
tap detection failures in the future.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415796
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
No effect since we don't care about the mouse itself. But when running
on kernels without uinput's UI_GET_SYSNAME this can cause misdetection of
the uinput device and test case failures. Simply picking a differently named
device avoids that.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Introduced in commit 8e7f99c27a we only allowed horizontal edge scrolling
on devices larger than 50mm to leave enough reactive space on the touchpad.
Looking at a ruler, a 50mm high touchpad is still large enough to leave the
bottom 7mm as an horizontal edge scroll area. Reduce the minimum size to 40mm
instead, that's closer to where it starts to get a bit iffy.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422221
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Specify the layout of the combo so we know when to initialize palm detection.
This allows us to drop palm detection on external touchpads otherwise,
replacing the wacom-specific check with something more generic..
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
We don't initialize click methods on devices with physical buttons. This model
is a special case, it's not a clickpad but it only has one button (because one
button is all you ever need and whatnot).
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99283
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We need to remember whether a tap was down or just hovering, otherwise we mess
up the state machine when we send tap release events for taps that never
switched to TOUCH_BEGIN. This is quick fix, really we should have a new state
here, but that's a lot harder to implement.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
They weren't originally prefixed but the various tests were, but now that we
only have one test runner binary anyway, the prefix helps sorting the files
easily within e.g. gcov results.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
