This was observed when running in device mode with:
`libinput debug-events $EVENT_NODE`
When removing the monitored device, the no "device removed" message was
not shown.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@t-8ch.de>
The group names are forced by check (they are called suite names there) but
for our test suite they provide very little benefit. Much easier to just
use the filename a test is in as group name.
This removes the pure substring match for --filter-group, it's now fnmatch
only. group names are short enough that the typing isn't an issue and we don't
want to run tests twice (e.g. 'pad' is also in 'touchpad').
This patch caused #574 until it got fixed in d838e3a3a4
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Symmetrical to litest_create_context(), this allows us to store special data
in that context that we have access to during the tests.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The recommended way to have libinput ignore specific devices so far was to
remove the ID_INPUT* properties from the device. That may also affect other
pieces of the stack that need access to this device.
For the niche case of a device that should only be ignored by libinput but
otherwise be treated normally by the system, we now support the
LIBINPUT_IGNORE_DEVICE property.
If the property is set to "0", it's equivalent to being unset. This gets
around some technical limitations in udev where unsetting a property is
impossible via a hwdb entry.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102229
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Uninitialized variables, potential NULL dereferences, dead assignments and an
unused return value.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The test suite (and tests) we have now all clean up nicely before calling the
final libinput_unref(). Add one where there's at least one device still
connected.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The first event is always a device added event, skip the loops that would
paper over this. If we ever change this, the tests *should* fail.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
They weren't originally prefixed but the various tests were, but now that we
only have one test runner binary anyway, the prefix helps sorting the files
easily within e.g. gcov results.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
