Now that we're emulating everything correctly, let's mark it as proper touch
device.
Two test cases need to be excluded:
- double-down triggers an assert in the test device because this isn't
possible this way with protocol A devices
- the axisrange warning test can't be triggered, mtdev clips those axes
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This device mostly behaved like a normal touch device except for
SYN_MT_REPORT. Switch it to behave like a real protocol A device and adjust
the test accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The test device initialization code was a bit of duplicated boilerplate and
required adding a reference to the devices to the 'devices' list in litest.c.
Automate this with a new TEST_DEVICE macro that adds the devices to a custom
section in the binary, then loops throught that section to get the device out.
This reduces the boilerplate for each test device to just the TEST_MACRO and
the LITEST_foo device enum entry. It also now automates the shortname of the
device.
The device's shortname was standardised in this approach as well, lowercase
and dashes only.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We have one. Yay. Lucky us. Go forth and celebrate.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Yong Bakos <ybakos@humanoriented.com>
