Add support for a client to request the creation of a new device
from the EIS implementation. This is necessary in situations where the
devices created by the EIS implementation are not (or no longer)
suitable for the client to function correctly.
The primary use-case of this is the upcoming tablet tool support where a
client may need to create multiple tablet tools in response to a new
physical tool brought into proximity locally.
Other use-cases include a client closing a device but requiring that
device (or one with similar capabilities) later.
The implementation in libei is straightforward
- on the client side we have a new function to request the new device:
ei_seat_request_device_with_capabilities()
- on the server side we have a new event EIS_EVENT_SEAT_DEVICE_REQUESTED
that can make use of the existing eis_event_seat_has_capability() API
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libinput/libei/-/merge_requests/345>
The protocol currently supports a ei_device.done event to notify
the ei client that the initial description of the device is complete.
For some future use-cases the client may need to futher negotiate
properties of the device. For example for tablet tools the client may
narrow down capabilities of the tool.
The sequence with the new request is thus e.g.
-> ei_seat.device
-> ei_device.name
-> ei_device.interface
-> ei_device.interface
-> ei_device.done
<- ei_device.ready
-> ei_device.resumed
In libei the request is sent automatically on unref of
the DEVICE_ADDED event. This makes clients immediately compatible
and for the typical (future) use-case of device configuration. Said
configuration will likely be handled in response to the DEVICE_ADDED
event anyway.
In libeis, a new EIS_EVENT_DEVICE_READY event that is sent when the client
sends that same event on the protocol, informing the EIS implementation
that this device is ready. For clients that do not support that version
the event is emulated immediately after sending ei_device.done.
This requires a flag bit to be long-term maintainable. The typical
EIS implementation currently calls eis_device_add() immediately
followed by eis_device_resume(). This doesn't leave any room to
wait for the client's ei_device.ready request.
One backwards-compatible solution could be to buffer the
eis_device_resume() until the ei_device.ready has been received but this
is fraught with hairy corner cases, e.g. if the client is a receiver
context we would also have to buffer all events immediately sent to the
client.
So instead, we have a flag in the context and if set by the caller, we
change the internal behavior to match ei_device interface version 3.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libinput/libei/-/merge_requests/346>
This allows the application to hold the sync event for a while longer,
e.g. to ensure previous events from EIS have passed through relevant
plumbing and reached their internally intended targets, which might
happen synchronously between each processed EIS event.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libinput/libei/-/merge_requests/340>
This event is required to fix an issue with the current
ei_callback.done handling in libeis: previously we would imediately send
the ei_callback.done upon receiving ei_connection.sync from the client.
This results in incorrect behavior as we may have events in the queue
(and/or pending a frame) that the EIS implementation hasn't seen yet.
For example a client sending:
- ei_pointer.motion
- ei_connection.sync
- ei_device.frame
- ei_connection.sync
Will queue a motion + frame event on the EIS side during eis_dispatch()
but immediately receive done events for both sync requests.
This could be handled purely internally by keeping the sync event in the
queue but hidden to the caller - and automatically calling done when
it's that events turn, i.e. something like:
```
struct eis_event *eis_get_event(struct eis) {
struct eis_event *e = first_event(eis);
if (e == EIS_EVENT_SYNC) {
eis_callback_send_done(e);
eis_event_unref(e);
e = next_event(eis);
}
return e;
}
```
but that opens us up to a set of potential bugs detailed in
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libinput/libei/-/issues/71#note_2694603
So let's go the easy route by having a new event type that does nothing
other than eis_event_unref() in the EIS implementation. This way we can
queue the event and have everything behave in-order and as expected.
Closes#71
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libinput/libei/-/merge_requests/316>
In the protocol it's a new request/event that is sent instead of the
touch up event.
In the library this is implemented as ei_touch_cancel() which
transparently sends cancel() or up depending on the EIS implementation
support. This is mirrored for the EIS implementation.
Where touch cancel is received as an event it is presented
as EI_EVENT_TOUCH_UP with an ei_event_touch_is_cancel() flag to
check if it was a cancel. This is required for backwards compatbility,
we cannot replace the TOUCH_UP event with a TOUCH_CANCEL event without
breaking existing callers. To add a new event type we would need clients
announcing support for those event types but that's an effort that's
better postponed until we have a stronger need for it (see #68).
Closes#60
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libinput/libei/-/merge_requests/308>
Build a separate libei-eierpecken.so that is identical to libei.so but
allows adding an offset to ei_now() for the eierpecken tests. That
offset is added to the return value of ei_now(), removing the real-time
dependency of the tests.
In other words, we can call peck_ei_add_time_offset(peck, s2us(5)) to
add 5 seconds to the time and continue the test as if that time has
elapsed.
Approximately every user of libei(s) will want something like this for
easier debugging, converting the numeric event type into something that
can be printed into the debug logs.
Let's provide this here so this doesn't need to be duplicated.
Same as the corresponding ei change a few commits ago, this one does all
the EIS renaming in the same manner.
As with the libei changes, an EIS implementation must now handle the
EIS_DEVICE_CAP_BUTTON and EI_DEVICE_CAP_SCROLL capabilities. In
virtually all cases, clients will likely expect that a device with the
pointer or absolute pointer capabilities will also have button and
scroll capabilities.
Now that the protocol interfaces are more fine-grained, let's match this
with the C API too.
This is just a rename of things so that in general
ei_pointer_*foo now becomes ei_foo*.
A few notable renames for better readability here:
- ei_device_scroll_delta (because scroll_scroll is awkward)
- ei_event_scroll_get_dx/dy and
ei_event_scroll_get_discrete_dx/dy to indicate the delta-ness
Beyond that, clients must ensure to check/bind to the new
EI_DEVICE_CAP_BUTTON and EI_DEVICE_CAP_SCROLL capabilities to be able
to send button or scroll events.
Note that this API now allows for an EIS implementation to send a device
that only has a button or a scroll cap. Or a pointer cap without
buttons, etc. It's up to the clients how to handle such devices
(probably: ignore them).
This protocol is wayland-like though it uses a slightly different
message format. The XML file uses the same structure, except for the
"fixed" type which is "float" here.
The scanner uses a jinja template to generate source and header files
for ei and eis which are now used instead of the protobuf-generated
objects. Note that the scanner is a minimal working version, some
features like enum value checks are not yet implemented.
Unlike wayland we do not need to generate the libwayland-like library,
we only need the wire protocol parser - some shortcuts can thus be taken.
To keep the changes simple, the protocol currently is a flat protocol
with only one interface and all messages copied over from the previous
ei.proto file. In future commits, this will be moved to the respective
interfaces instead.
This makes it easier to correlate a particular input transaction
(whether there are events or not) with out-of-band information like the
planned portal InputCapture::Activated signal's "activation-id".
The primary use-case for these properties in libei itself was to send
some fixed information (pid, cmdline and conection type). In the portal
case, these can be obtained out-of-band via the portal. In the
non-portal case these can be obtained from the socket itself (fetch pid,
look up /proc/pid/cmdline) which is just as reliable as trusting
whatever libei sends.
The only other use-case for the properties was the activation id in the
InputCapture::Activated portal signal. This can be achieved with a
serial in the START_EMULATING event.
Punt this job to the caller, any structured logging handler doesn't need
them anyway and it makes handling of messages more awkward.
For our default log handlers (fprintf) we can just append them
ourselves.
Fixes#19
Incoming device events are now added to a device-internal queue. Once
the frame event comes in, that queue is shuffled over to the main event
queue. For libei/the EIS implementation this means that device events
are seen only once the frame event appears from the sender (or it is
emulated by other means).
Currently only implemented for frame events, the vague plan for the
future is to merely queue the device events internally and "release"
them once a frame event was received, retrofitting the timestamp to the
C event struct (i.e. making ei_event_get_time() available on all device
events).
Meanwhile, the frame event it is.
Where the sender sends empty frame events, or a device event without a
subsequent frame events ensure that event is filtered or emulated in our
event queue.
Note: because of our sender filters, we cannot actually test
this, at least not easily. Let's hope it works.
Previously, a client could only bind to a capability immediately after
SEAT_ADDED and with a rather awkward API to confirm the capabilities.
Change this to allow for dynamic binding of capabilities, i.e. a client
calls ei_bind_capability() or ei_unbind_capability() whenever it feels
like, causing the respective devices of this capabilty to be added or
removed.
This allows for clients that are temporarily disinterested in a
capability but may require said capability later.
The default function takes one capability, a helper for enable/disable
multiple capabilities in one go is provided as well. On the protocol,
only the "bind" request exists which always represents the currently
wanted set of capabilities.
Note that the helper functions for multiple capabilities require NULL
(not zero) as sentinel, thanks to gcc.
One macro that also defines the cleanup function, one macro that only
defines the unref. This is required for any place where we want to
use cleanup from multiple source files - like the test suite.
Prevents any ABI suprprises by the enums being expanded to long or
shortened to char on special targets.
Fixes#11
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
There is data that libei and the EIS implementation will want to
exchange that is not covered by the immediate API.
To avoid having to add APIs for all of these, let's provide a generic
property API that both server and client can use to exchange this info.
The property API provides read/write/delete permissions but those only
apply to the client, not the server. The idea is that a server can
create (or restrict) properties that the client can read but not modify
and/or delete. A special-case are properties filled in automatically by
libei: ei.application.pid and ei.application.cmdline. These could be
used by e.g. the portal implementation to match permissions.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This effectively provides the EIS implementation with a notification
that the client will actually send events in the near future. To be used
by e.g. synergy-like clients when the pointer enters the logical screen
so that the EIS implementation can flash a warning or something.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This allows a client to trigger kinetic scrolling (or prevent it).
For compositors implementing EIS, the only realistic scroll source is
continuous which allows for scroll stop events. So let's give the client
the opportunity to trigger those on demand.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Already present in e.g. libinput and wayland, this event allows us to
group several events together to denote them as a logical group.
Required for multi-touch but as we've learned with Wayland it's also
required to group other events (scroll events in the case of Wayland).
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This changes the protocol so that it is the EIS implementation that
creates devices within a seat.
A client now "binds" to a seat and the EIS implementation creates
devices matching the requested capabilities. A client can close a device
if it no longer wants those but otherwise everything (including pointer
ranges) is handled by the server.
This is one giant patch because changes at the protocol level cannot
easily be broken out into smaller patches. Some FIXMEs are left which
will be handled in follow-up patches, e.g. the keymap handling is
basically broken right now.
Fixes#7
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
To cut down on the boilerplate, an unref-able struct variable can now be
declared as
_unref_(type) *name = NULL;
which is the equivalent of
_cleanup_(type_unrefp) struct type *name = NULL;
Let's see how that style ends up reading.
This means we can get rid of the custom _cleanup_foo_ functions everywhere, no
need for all the extra #defines etc. A somewhat special case is systemd which
defines the various unrefp functions for us in the headers, so we can use them
directly.
OBJECT_IMPLEMENT_UNREF now also creates the unrefp function for this object -
this of course conflicts where DECLARE_UNREF_CLEANUP_FUNC is in scope. Not a
problem so far, let's see how we go.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Client-side the approach is a managed touch object rather than passing the
touchid around. This is intentional, it allows for a stackable API in the
future if we need to add things like pressure or major/minor to it.
On the server side the touches are managed through the event object anyway, so
we don't need the same abstraction there.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The original idea here was that a libei client could request the Pointer
capability to be notified of any pointer movements, thus providing a simple
way to capture input for the synergy use-case.
This is a can of worms better left untouched. How input events are captured
and what information is available is quite specific to the display server, let
alone the triggers for when it needs to start and stop. To have that in libei
requires something like triggers ("start when pointer hits the edge") which
again opens a new can of worms. Which seat are we referring to? What is a
screen edge? How about shortcuts?
Receiving input events can be handled by libeis anyway: any EIS server is
capable of receiving input events by definition so the capability monitoring
could be solved by making the capturing compositor a libei client and the
other process an EIS server. i.e. the circle is closed with:
[compositor|libei] -> [EIS|synergy-client]
||
[synergy-server|libei] -> [EIS|compositor]
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The logger utilities are useful for quick prototyping, but we've reached the
point where we need the "proper" implementation of a log handler.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Same as already done for libei. There's relatively little benefit here since
we won't have a lot of different events and any caller will do the switch
based on the event type anyway. So let's just export a single event type and
have everything contained in that.
Since this required rewriting all getters, let's move the lot to a new file
and streamline things a bit that way.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
