This changes the protocol so that it is the EIS implementation that
creates devices within a seat.
A client now "binds" to a seat and the EIS implementation creates
devices matching the requested capabilities. A client can close a device
if it no longer wants those but otherwise everything (including pointer
ranges) is handled by the server.
This is one giant patch because changes at the protocol level cannot
easily be broken out into smaller patches. Some FIXMEs are left which
will be handled in follow-up patches, e.g. the keymap handling is
basically broken right now.
Fixes#7
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Removing a seat could cause two device remove events to happen. Fix this by
splitting the removal up into two bits: removed by server and removed by
client. Only once both bits are set, remove the device.
This needs to happen in libei and libeis.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
To cut down on the boilerplate, an unref-able struct variable can now be
declared as
_unref_(type) *name = NULL;
which is the equivalent of
_cleanup_(type_unrefp) struct type *name = NULL;
Let's see how that style ends up reading.
This means we can get rid of the custom _cleanup_foo_ functions everywhere, no
need for all the extra #defines etc. A somewhat special case is systemd which
defines the various unrefp functions for us in the headers, so we can use them
directly.
OBJECT_IMPLEMENT_UNREF now also creates the unrefp function for this object -
this of course conflicts where DECLARE_UNREF_CLEANUP_FUNC is in scope. Not a
problem so far, let's see how we go.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
After CONNECT, the EIS implementation needs to add one or more seats. The
libei client can only create devices within those seats. This mirrors the
wayland hierarchy as well as the X.Org one.
The seat has a set of allowed capabilities, so the client knows ahead of time
when it may not be possible to create a specific device.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Client-side the approach is a managed touch object rather than passing the
touchid around. This is intentional, it allows for a stackable API in the
future if we need to add things like pressure or major/minor to it.
On the server side the touches are managed through the event object anyway, so
we don't need the same abstraction there.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Because events may be in-transit when a client removes the device, we need to
make this a full roundtrip to the server. Otherwise the client may assume a
device is removed, releases all references and then gets the original device
added event for that device. Better to have this as a round-trip instead.
This requires the server to call eis_device_disconnect() on the removed
notifications but we do so during eis_event_unref() anyway in case the server
forgets.
And it changes some of the API behaviors, so adjust the tests for that.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is the proto parser and it'll know when we need an fd on the message, so
let's make sure we have everything in place to fetch the fd.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The logger utilities are useful for quick prototyping, but we've reached the
point where we need the "proper" implementation of a log handler.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This was already spelled out in the documentation but just not yet
implemented. New starting state for any device added by EIS is "suspended",
the server needs to explicitly resume it before events are accepted.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This de-duplicates a bunch of things that we don't need to duplicate,
specifically the protocol part that splits the data up into parseable chunks.
That we have Frames in between messages is an implementation detail, this way
neither libei nor libeis have to care about it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Original idea of 1/1000 of a pixel was to allow subpixels while sending fixed
width down the wire. Let's not care about that and use doubles instead.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
On error, we call eis_client_disconnect() which unrefs the client. Since we're
using it afterwards for debugging logs, we need to keep at least one ref
going.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We can remove those when we have a working implementation, for now it's too
painful to debug when an exchange doesn't work for some reason.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
For the Portal case, we'll have the portal open the sockets for us and then
(depending on policy) restrict what the client can do. Then the socket can be
passed to the client with e.g. keyboards disabled and the client is none the
wiser (other than that the server will reject any keyboard caps).
Since the portal doesn't need a EI context, the configuration is a separate
small library.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
The main purpose of that was for (plain-text protocol) debugging. With the
current intentions to "preload" a connection with restrictions, having the
server initiate a connection is not useful.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
This is a more explicit API that makes it more obvious where the ref/unref
calls need to go. The sink now has two refs to the sources as well (epoll data
pointer and the list) which means a caller cannot just source_unref() anymore
without removing a source. Since this is how we've been using it anyway - meh.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Let the context take care of adding the device so we have better separation
here. Removal isn't handled in a special way because any list node can remove
itself safel anyway.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
protobuf relies on external framing and exact buffer lengths to parse things
correctly. So let's provide that by sending a fixed-length Frame message
before every real message.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We're in a library here, so expecting the caller to handle SIGPIPE just in
case we get it is a bit demanding. Let's use send() instead so we can just
prevent that altogether.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
We may get more than one message per dispatch so let's make sure we iterate
through all the available data.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
