The index 0 is a legitimate index used for character codes that do not
correspond to any glyph in the font. Instead, the API reserves 0xFFFF
(kCGFontIndexInvalid) as the invalid index and defines 0xFFFE
(kCGFontIndexMax = kCGGlyphMax) as the maximum legal index.
Fixes text-glyph-range.
Unicode characters in the Supplementary Multilingual Plane are encoded
as surrogate pairs in UTF-16. This test tries to verify that backends
do not perform UCS4 to UTF-16 conversion by truncation.
Test case for bug 89232 - painting a recording surface to a
pdf/ps surface omits objects on the recording surface with negative
coordinates even though the pattern matrix has transformed the objects
to within the page extents.
The image surface also fails when the recording surface is bounded.
Commit 4e3ef57bc8 added
coverage-intersecting-triangles with an incorrect reference and
generator. The test checks the rasterization of two overlapping
triangles in the following position:
. .
|\ /|
| X |
|/ \|
.---.
Since the triangles have both vertical and horizontal sides of size
x/WIDTH, the expected coverage is 3/4 (75%) of (x/WIDTH)^2. The
original code, instead, was checking for a coverage of 0.75*x/WIDTH,
as if one of the sides was always 1 unit long.
The image and xlib backends still suffer from some jitter, caused by
the approximation of the actual coverage by means of sampling. For
this reason their references are still considered XFAIL, even though
their result now looks mostly consistent with the expected reference.
These two images are mis-rendered (clearly evident from visual
inspection). By removing them, the test will fall back to the more
general format-specific images, huge-radial.argb32.ref.png and
huge-radial.rgb24.ref.png.
Note that the huge-radial.pdf tests still fail to pass, but the pdiff
looks more sensible.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66218
Signed-off-by: Bryce Harrington <bryce@bryceharrington.org>
The pixman downscaling "95" tests attempt to rescale a 96x96 pixmap to
95x95. Ideally the borders between color areas should be sharp, but for
this use case we allow for 1 pixel of blur between the areas as
acceptable. The choice of what color to use for this blurred region is
not important, and in fact varies from backend to backend.
The old reference images were generated by Krzysztof Kosiński's
downscaling algorithm. These new images are against the algorithms
written by Bill Spitzak.
Signed-off-by: Bryce Harrington <bryce@osg.samsung.com>
When investing the symmetry of the raterisation, we want to have a
simple replay of all of the original geometry through a the flipped
recording surface. This reduces the worry about artifacts from the
clipped rendering.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
(And include a git add missed from commit
ccd48b3464
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Tue Sep 30 14:06:21 2014 +0100
test: Remove more duplicated reference images
but were mostly invalidated by the rasteriser changes anyway).
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
In order to check the behaviour of the analytic rasteriser inside tor,
let's compare it against a very simple rasteriser that uses a rectiliner
256x256 sample grid.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
When updating the quorem between cells, we would lose the overflow
increment as it was only applied locally and not preserved by updating
the quorem.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
The goal is to preserve the precision in the gradients of the edges and
only apply the projection into the final cell location. We also include
the half-subrow offset as spotted by Massimo.
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84396
Testcase: coverage-rhombus
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
If we have both a argb32 and rgb24 reference image that are identical,
we can replace them with a plain reference image. I also prefer to have
argb32/rgb24 versions of the reference images if rgb24 differs from the
plain reference.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Massimo noticed that the record/record-flip were not being rasterised as
identical mirror images due to a half-subpixel offset in the tor scan
converter. This test attempts to reproduce this error by rendering a
rhombus around the origin of each cell (that is it generates 4 mirror
images of a triangle in the 4 different orientations0. The expectation
is that each pixel in the group is lit identically as the coverage is
identical.
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84396
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
These reference images are generated by the new GENERATE_REFERENCE mode that the
previous commit introduced.
I have no idea what the "base" images. From my reading of the code in
boilerplate/, these images will be used by the test-XXX targets. However, these
seem to generate the same result than e.g. the image backend. Thus, I deleted
these files.
There is still pthread-same-source.quartz.xfail.png. This file was created in
commit b6e16b8d and touched in commit 5a1e590b1. No idea if this is still valid
and since I don't have a Mac, I won't touch it.
The test is still broken on the following backends (out of the backends I have
compiled in). This mostly seems to be differences in image scaling, but I
couldn't figure out an easy way to tell the test suite that the new results are
correct.
test-paginated, ps2, ps3, xcb, xcb-window, xcb-window&, xcb-fallback, xlib,
xlib-window, xlib-fallback, recording
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Add test case for https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68382
Something has regressed in the recording surface. All the recording
surface based backends lose the alpha from the paint_With_alpha.
The _cairo_color_double_to_short() function converts a double
precision floating point value in the range of [0.0, 1.0] to a
uint16_t integer by dividing the [0.0, 1.0] range into 65536
equal-sized intervals and then associating each interval with an
integer.
Under the assumption that an integer i corresponds to the real value i
/ 65535.0 this algorithm introduces more error than necessary as can
be seen from the following picture showing the analogous
transformation for two-bit integers:
+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
0b00 | 0b01 | 0b10 | 0b11
+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
which shows that some floating point values are not converted to the
integer that would minimize the error in value that that integer
corresponds to.
Instead, this patch uses standard rounding, which makes the diagram
look like this:
+-------+---------------+---------------+-------+
0b00 | 0b01 | 0b10 | 0b11
+-------+---------------+---------------+-------+
It's clear that if the values corresponding to the given integers are
fixed, then it's not possible to decrease the resulting error by
moving any of the interval boundaries.
See this thread for more information:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/cairo/2013-October/024691.html
Reference images updated:
pthread-similar.ref.png
record-paint-alpha.ref.png
record90-paint-alpha.argb32.ref
record90-paint-alpha.rgb24.ref.png
xcb-huge-image-shm.ref.png
xcb-huge-subimage.ref.png
All of these have only one-step differences to the old images.
Also update the image.arg32 reference images, since for now we're just
accepting pixman's output as truth. This fixes up several tests:
was is
Tests run: 420 420
Passed: 224 261
Failed: 195 159
Expected Failed: 0 0
Error: 0 0
Crashed: 0 0
Untested: 0 0
Total: 420 420
Thanks to psychon for finding the code error in the test.
This adds testcases for the various cairo filter options, each of which
match to corresponding pixman filters. Use the 'downscale' keyword if
invoking tests using cairo-test-suite.
The 24-pixel reference images were produced from quad-color.png using
Gimp's Scale Image command with Interpolation set to None. It is
assumed that all filters should handle a 1:4 scaling cleanly with no
antialiased blurring.
The 95-pixel reference images assume differing types of antialiasing
based on the quality level. We are using the image.argb32 output as
reference here. Potentially some other rendering algorithm could
conceivably provide better results in the future.
The 96-pixel reference images are simply copies of the original
quad-color.png file. It is assumed that 1:1 downscaling operations
should produce no visible change to the original image.
Signed-off-by: Bryce Harrington <b.harrington@samsung.com>
Downscaling from 96 to 24 is easy since it's an even multiple, so try
scaling by -1 pixel too.
This adds a 1:1 scaling test case as well, which should pass through the
image unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Bryce Harrington <b.harrington@samsung.com>
This adds pixman-downscale.c, which tests correctness of PNG images
scaled down using pixman routines.
Signed-off-by: Bryce Harrington <b.harrington@samsung.com>
Commit d7f5a1bec fixed a bug. This caused 12 new test failures for the
test-traps test target:
caps-tails-curve degenerate-arc degenerate-path joins subsurface
subsurface-scale twin twin-antialias-gray twin-antialias-mixed
twin-antialias-none twin-antialias-subpixel user-font
Most of these are indeed (new?) bugs. However, caps-tails-curve actually started
producing the expected result and the reference image just wrongly captures the
old state of things.
At the time of that commit, just taking the output from test-traps as the new
reference image works fine for all backends. However, with current git,
something introduced more antialiasing noise and now test-traps changed again
while cairo-xcb stayed with the old result. Thus, we also need a new reference
image to fix this test.
(The wrong reference images come from commit 8488ae02 which turned test-traps'
results into reference images)
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Where a content specific reference image exists, prefer to have both
content reference images (i.e. both argb32.ref and rgb24.ref) rather
than a mix of .ref and argb32/rgb24.
Courtesy of the improved check-ref-dups written by Bryce Harrington:
Running make check on the codebase (with default configuration) with the
redundant images removed produces essentially the same test results:
Before
------
Tests run: 13687
Passed: 9216
Failed: 3566
Expected Failed: 312
Error: 1
Crashed: 17
Untested: 575
Total: 13687
After
-----
Tests run: 13689
Passed: 9216
Failed: 3566
Expected Failed: 312
Error: 1
Crashed: 19
Untested: 575
Total: 13689
(with the exception being the pthread tests misbehaving between runs)
A side effect of
commit c986a7310b
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Thu Jan 24 08:55:54 2013 +0000
image: Enable inplace compositing with opacities for general routines
is that we should in theory be reducing the rounding errors when
compositing coverage.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
This creates an image surface with a non-natural stride and paints it to a
similar surface.
In the xcb backend, this causes a call to _cairo_xcb_connection_put_subimage()
which tries to send a huge PutImage request. As a result, xcb kills the X11
connection.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
