[In testing, I was able to reproduce Federico's results for most, but
not all, of the test images. There might be some additional
platform-specific discrepancies that need ironed out, but this is a
solid step forward in any case.
Results for a quick run against just the image backend on my system:
--bryce]
Signed-off-by: Bryce Harrington <bryce@bryceharrington.org>
Bryce Harrington <bryce@bryceharrington.org>
Signed-off-by: Bryce Harrington <b.harrington@samsung.com>
(And include a git add missed from commit
ccd48b3464
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Tue Sep 30 14:06:21 2014 +0100
test: Remove more duplicated reference images
but were mostly invalidated by the rasteriser changes anyway).
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
When updating the quorem between cells, we would lose the overflow
increment as it was only applied locally and not preserved by updating
the quorem.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
The goal is to preserve the precision in the gradients of the edges and
only apply the projection into the final cell location. We also include
the half-subrow offset as spotted by Massimo.
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84396
Testcase: coverage-rhombus
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
If we have both a argb32 and rgb24 reference image that are identical,
we can replace them with a plain reference image. I also prefer to have
argb32/rgb24 versions of the reference images if rgb24 differs from the
plain reference.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Having discovered that I had recreated the references images with a
buggy rasteriser, we now need to recreate them with the correct reference
settings.
With over two thousand references images now, it is starting to make the
test directory look cluttered!
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
2011-09-15 14:05:10 +01:00
Renamed from test/operator-clear.argb32.ref.png (Browse further)
