From d4545910e2836eb6fc7dc2ed787b02aea514cb0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Bryce W. Harrington" Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:16:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] test: Note naming scheme for XFAIL images in README Signed-off-by: Bryce Harrington --- test/README | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/README b/test/README index fef240dae..bbb3596a0 100644 --- a/test/README +++ b/test/README @@ -256,8 +256,9 @@ correct, then there's likely a bug in poppler. In this case, we can simply report the poppler bug, (making it block 12143 above), post the PDF result from the test suite, and list the bug in this file. Once we've done this, we can capture poppler's buggy output as a -pdf-specific reference image so that the test suite will regard the -test as passing, (and we'll ensure there is no regression). +pdf-specific reference image (as reference/*.xfail.png) so that the +test suite will regard the test as passing, (and we'll ensure there +is no regression). Once the poppler bug gets fixed, the test suite will start reporting a false negative again, and this will be easy to fix by simply removing