From 7185c00e15aecf14d1957ba2e4f386ecb4e2a635 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:21:28 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [PS] Add note about possible need for fix.

---
 src/cairo-ps-surface.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/cairo-ps-surface.c b/src/cairo-ps-surface.c
index dcc74bae5..b55900c48 100644
--- a/src/cairo-ps-surface.c
+++ b/src/cairo-ps-surface.c
@@ -1740,6 +1740,11 @@ emit_surface_pattern (cairo_ps_surface_t *surface,
 	 */
 	switch (pattern->base.extend) {
 	case CAIRO_EXTEND_NONE:
+	    /* XXX We may need to update this to something like the code
+	     * that is in PDF.  The point is, xstep/ystep are in pattern
+	     * space, not device space, so surface->width/height do not
+	     * make much sense.  But most of the time patterns scale up,
+	     * not down, so this is less of a problem. */
 	    xstep = MAX (image->width, surface->width);
 	    ystep = MAX (image->height, surface->height);
 	    break;