mirror of
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.git
synced 2025-12-25 13:00:16 +01:00
98c3ac1480
- instead of g_str_hash()/g_direct_hash(), use our own functions nm_str_hash()/nm_direct_hash(). Those use siphash24 with a random seed. - don't pass g_direct_equal() to GHashTable. When omitting the equal function, it falls back to direct pointer comparison, which is likely faster. In any case, it's consistent to not use g_direct_hash() when using pointer equality. - instead of g_int_hash()/g_int64_hash()/g_double_hash(), use our nm_pint_hash()/nm_pint64_hash()/nm_pdouble_hash(). The latter two don't exist yet. The reason is that we want to use siphash24. Yes, our name differs from glib's. Our naming seems to make sense to me however, because we also have nm_pstr_hash(), nm_pdirect_hash() and even nm_ppdirect_hash() for following the pointers. Naming is hard. - instead of g_int_equal()/g_int64_equal()/g_double_equal() use our nm_pint_equal()/nm_pint64_equal()/nm_pdouble_equal(). The latter two don't exist yet. The reason is purely naming consistency since our hash variants follow the other name. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| alpine | ||
| art/logo | ||
| debian | ||
| editors | ||
| fedora | ||
| scripts | ||