From the files under "shared/nm-utils" we build an internal library
that provides glib-based helper utilities.
Move the files of that basic library to a new subdirectory
"shared/nm-glib-aux" and rename the helper library "libnm-core-base.la"
to "libnm-glib-aux.la".
Reasons:
- the name "utils" is overused in our code-base. Everything's an
"utils". Give this thing a more distinct name.
- there were additional files under "shared/nm-utils", which are not
part of this internal library "libnm-utils-base.la". All the files
that are part of this library should be together in the same
directory, but files that are not, should not be there.
- the new name should better convey what this library is and what is isn't:
it's a set of utilities and helper functions that extend glib with
funcitonality that we commonly need.
There are still some files left under "shared/nm-utils". They have less
a unifying propose to be in their own directory, so I leave them there
for now. But at least they are separate from "shared/nm-glib-aux",
which has a very clear purpose.
(cherry picked from commit 80db06f768)
Platform has it's own, simple implementation of object types:
NMPObject. Extract a base type and move it to "shared/nm-utils/nm-obj.h"
so it can be reused.
The base type is trival, but it allows us to implement other objects
which are compatible with NMPObjects. Currently there is no API for generic
NMObjBaseInst type, so compatible in this case only means, that they
can be used in the same context (see example below).
The only thing that you can do with a NMObjBaseInst is check it's
NMObjBaseClass.
Incidentally, NMObjBaseInst is also made compatible to GTypeInstance.
It means, an NMObjBaseInst is not necessarily a valid GTypeInstance (like NMPObject
is not), but it could be implemented as such.
For example, you could do:
if (NMP_CLASS_IS_VALID ((NMPClass *) obj->klass)) {
/* is an NMPObject */
} else if (G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE_TYPE (obj, NM_TYPE_SOMETHING)) {
/* it a NMSometing GType */
} else {
/* something else? */
}
The reason why NMPObject is not implemented as proper GTypeInstance is
because it would require us to register a GType (like
g_type_register_fundamental). However, then the NMPClass struct can
no longer be const and immutable memory. But we could.
NMObjBaseInst may or may not be a GTypeInstance. In a sense, it's
a base type of GTypeInstance and all our objects should be based
on it (optionally, they we may make them valid GTypes too).
