Add a new option that allows to activate a profile multiple times
(at the same time). Previoulsy, all profiles were implicitly
NM_SETTING_CONNECTION_MULTI_CONNECT_SINGLE, meaning, that activating
a profile that is already active will deactivate it first.
This will make more sense, as we also add more match-options how
profiles can be restricted to particular devices. We already have
connection.type, connection.interface-name, and (ethernet|wifi).mac-address
to restrict a profile to particular devices. For example, it is however
not possible to specify a wildcard like "eth*" to match a profile to
a set of devices by interface-name. That is another missing feature,
and once we extend the matching capabilities, it makes more sense to
activate a profile multiple times.
See also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997998, which
previously changed that a connection is restricted to a single activation
at a time. This work relaxes that again.
This only adds the new property, it is not used nor implemented yet.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1555012
Instead of re-fetching the UUID each time with a D-Bus call,
cache/memoize it.
On my system, this improves
$ make check-local-clients-tests-test-client
from 20.9 to 20.4 seconds (- 2.6%). That is not stellar, but noticible
enough to warrant this simple change.
These nmcli calls are inside a Util.iter_nmcli_output_modes()
loop, hence, --terse will passed to them already.
Specifying --terse more than once, causes nmcli to fail.
We didn't actually want to test how nmcli rejects such
duplicate arguments. Adjust the test.
Add more tests for various output modes of nmcli.
This most interestingly includes a terse output for
$ nmcli device status
Which was not tested previously (but a later commit will change
behavior here).
This blows up the number of tests even further.
Previously, the test invoked nmcli 850 times (taking ~15 seconds
ony my machine), afterwards, it is 1334 times (taking ~20 seconds).
No doubt, this seems excessive and questionable.
However, I maintain that the computer doesn't mind running a lot of
redundant tests. The important thing is, that we cover as many cases
as possible. Trying at the same time to minimize the number of tests
by avoiding duplicates and redundant tests, is just a lot of manual
labor. Manual labor that must be repeated whenever new tests are added, to
ensure that this test case is not yet covered. So, I am fine
with the large number of tests. Let the computer do the work.
Instead of letting each nmcli run write an individual .expected file,
combine the output of multiple runs in one file (per test).
Advantages:
- since there is a very large number of tests, having a file for each
tests is cumbersome. For example, since they are all added to
$(EXTRA_DIST) (and since we use non-recursive make), autoconf can
easily hit a length limit when processing all the file names.
- previously, whenever we added tests, all .expected files shifted
and the diff was large. Now, there is a chance that the diff is
smaller and more accurate.
