mirror of
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.git
synced 2026-05-01 09:08:05 +02:00
device: ensure not rescheduling IP config changed on initial capture
update_ip4_config() and update_ip6_config() are called from nm_device_capture_initial_config(). At that point, we don't expect any activation-source scheduled, thus the "if" should not not be hit anyway. So, this patch should actually make no difference, but it seems clearer to me. Also, because it would be a bug to re-schedule the idle handler that is already pending, but from inspecting nm_device_capture_initial_config() it is not immediately clear that this cannot be the case.
This commit is contained in:
parent
ec2a21702a
commit
bac06c5ae6
1 changed files with 8 additions and 6 deletions
|
|
@ -8923,9 +8923,10 @@ update_ip4_config (NMDevice *self, gboolean initial)
|
|||
* it changing IP configurations before they are applied. Postpone the
|
||||
* update in such case.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (activation_source_is_scheduled (self,
|
||||
activate_stage5_ip4_config_commit,
|
||||
AF_INET)) {
|
||||
if ( !initial
|
||||
&& activation_source_is_scheduled (self,
|
||||
activate_stage5_ip4_config_commit,
|
||||
AF_INET)) {
|
||||
priv->queued_ip4_config_id = g_idle_add (queued_ip4_config_change, self);
|
||||
_LOGT (LOGD_DEVICE, "IP4 update was postponed");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
|
@ -9012,9 +9013,10 @@ update_ip6_config (NMDevice *self, gboolean initial)
|
|||
* it changing IP configurations before they are applied. Postpone the
|
||||
* update in such case.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (activation_source_is_scheduled (self,
|
||||
activate_stage5_ip6_config_commit,
|
||||
AF_INET6)) {
|
||||
if ( !initial
|
||||
&& activation_source_is_scheduled (self,
|
||||
activate_stage5_ip6_config_commit,
|
||||
AF_INET6)) {
|
||||
priv->queued_ip6_config_id = g_idle_add (queued_ip6_config_change, self);
|
||||
_LOGT (LOGD_DEVICE, "IP6 update was postponed");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue