mirror of
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.git
synced 2026-02-04 03:40:27 +01:00
all: change scheduling priority for idle actions to G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT_IDLE
g_idle_add() uses G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT_IDLE priority. Most of the time we don't care much about the priority. But at the places that this patch changes, I think that using G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT_IDLE (and following g_idle_add()) is more correct. The reason for this is not very strong, except that it's probably the better choice. And the old choice was made because I didn't realize that g_idle_add() uses another default priority. Hence, the old choice was not for good reasons either.
This commit is contained in:
parent
15e8837945
commit
9b030a3988
4 changed files with 19 additions and 8 deletions
|
|
@ -921,8 +921,10 @@ _ipv4ll_state_change_on_idle(NML3IPv4LL *self)
|
|||
nm_assert(NM_IS_L3_IPV4LL(self));
|
||||
|
||||
if (!self->state_change_on_idle_source) {
|
||||
self->state_change_on_idle_source =
|
||||
nm_g_idle_source_new(G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT, _ipv4ll_state_change_on_idle_cb, self, NULL);
|
||||
self->state_change_on_idle_source = nm_g_idle_source_new(G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT_IDLE,
|
||||
_ipv4ll_state_change_on_idle_cb,
|
||||
self,
|
||||
NULL);
|
||||
g_source_attach(self->state_change_on_idle_source, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7349,7 +7349,10 @@ _init_start_with_bus(NMClient *self)
|
|||
NULL);
|
||||
if (id == 0) {
|
||||
priv->init_data->cancel_on_idle_source =
|
||||
nm_g_idle_source_new(G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT, _init_start_cancel_on_idle_cb, self, NULL);
|
||||
nm_g_idle_source_new(G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT_IDLE,
|
||||
_init_start_cancel_on_idle_cb,
|
||||
self,
|
||||
NULL);
|
||||
g_source_attach(priv->init_data->cancel_on_idle_source, priv->main_context);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4691,14 +4691,20 @@ _nm_utils_invoke_on_idle_start(gboolean use_timeout,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (use_timeout) {
|
||||
/* We use G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT_IDLE both for the with/without timeout
|
||||
* case. The reason is not strong, but it seems right that the caller
|
||||
* requests a lower priority than G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT. That is unlike
|
||||
* what g_timeout_add() would do. */
|
||||
source = nm_g_timeout_source_new(timeout_msec,
|
||||
G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT,
|
||||
G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT_IDLE,
|
||||
_nm_utils_invoke_on_idle_cb_idle,
|
||||
data,
|
||||
NULL);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
source =
|
||||
nm_g_idle_source_new(G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT, _nm_utils_invoke_on_idle_cb_idle, data, NULL);
|
||||
source = nm_g_idle_source_new(G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT_IDLE,
|
||||
_nm_utils_invoke_on_idle_cb_idle,
|
||||
data,
|
||||
NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* use the current thread default context. */
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ nmcs_wait_for_objects_iterate_until_done(GMainContext *context, int timeout_msec
|
|||
nm_auto_destroy_and_unref_gsource GSource *idle_source = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
idle_source =
|
||||
nm_g_source_attach(nm_g_idle_source_new(G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT,
|
||||
nm_g_source_attach(nm_g_idle_source_new(G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT_IDLE,
|
||||
_wait_for_objects_iterate_until_done_idle_cb,
|
||||
&data,
|
||||
NULL),
|
||||
|
|
@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ nmcs_utils_poll(int poll_timeout_ms,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
poll_task_data->source_next_poll = nm_g_source_attach(
|
||||
nm_g_idle_source_new(G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT, _poll_start_cb, poll_task_data, NULL),
|
||||
nm_g_idle_source_new(G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT_IDLE, _poll_start_cb, poll_task_data, NULL),
|
||||
poll_task_data->context);
|
||||
|
||||
if (cancellable) {
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue