From 6ad8011e2dd3533860a4d98bd5de2528eecdd6cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Haller Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 15:08:19 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] platform: use IFA_FLAGS name instead of numeric value Originally, IFA_FLAGS might not have been present in the headers. In the mean time, we explicitly define it outself to be "8". --- src/platform/nm-linux-platform.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/platform/nm-linux-platform.c b/src/platform/nm-linux-platform.c index 1e7445be47..3138b171bc 100644 --- a/src/platform/nm-linux-platform.c +++ b/src/platform/nm-linux-platform.c @@ -2450,7 +2450,7 @@ _support_kernel_extended_ifa_flags_detect (struct nl_msg *msg) * we assume, that the kernel supports extended flags, IFA_F_MANAGETEMPADDR * and IFA_F_NOPREFIXROUTE (they were added together). **/ - _support_kernel_extended_ifa_flags = !!nlmsg_find_attr (msg_hdr, sizeof (struct ifaddrmsg), 8 /* IFA_FLAGS */); + _support_kernel_extended_ifa_flags = !!nlmsg_find_attr (msg_hdr, sizeof (struct ifaddrmsg), IFA_FLAGS); _LOG2D ("kernel-support: extended-ifa-flags: %s", _support_kernel_extended_ifa_flags ? "detected" : "not detected"); }