NetworkManager/src/core/nm-firewall-utils.c

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

816 lines
28 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
/*
* Copyright (C) 2004 - 2016 Red Hat, Inc.
* Copyright (C) 2005 - 2008 Novell, Inc.
*/
#include "src/core/nm-default-daemon.h"
#include "nm-firewall-utils.h"
#include "libnm-glib-aux/nm-str-buf.h"
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
#include "libnm-glib-aux/nm-io-utils.h"
#include "libnm-platform/nm-platform.h"
#include "nm-config.h"
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
#include "NetworkManagerUtils.h"
/*****************************************************************************/
static const struct {
const char *name;
const char *path;
} FirewallBackends[] = {
[NM_FIREWALL_BACKEND_NONE - 1] =
{
.name = "none",
},
[NM_FIREWALL_BACKEND_NFTABLES - 1] =
{
.name = "nftables",
.path = NFT_PATH,
},
[NM_FIREWALL_BACKEND_IPTABLES - 1] =
{
.name = "iptables",
.path = IPTABLES_PATH,
},
};
/*****************************************************************************/
#define _SHARE_IPTABLES_SUBNET_TO_STR_LEN (INET_ADDRSTRLEN + 1 + 2 + 1)
static const char *
_share_iptables_subnet_to_str(char buf[static _SHARE_IPTABLES_SUBNET_TO_STR_LEN],
in_addr_t addr,
guint8 plen)
{
char buf_addr[INET_ADDRSTRLEN];
in_addr_t netmask;
int l;
glib-aux: rename IP address related helpers from "nm-inet-utils.h" - name things related to `in_addr_t`, `struct in6_addr`, `NMIPAddr` as `nm_ip4_addr_*()`, `nm_ip6_addr_*()`, `nm_ip_addr_*()`, respectively. - we have a wrapper `nm_inet_ntop()` for `inet_ntop()`. This name of our wrapper is chosen to be familiar with the libc underlying function. With this, also name functions that are about string representations of addresses `nm_inet_*()`, `nm_inet4_*()`, `nm_inet6_*()`. For example, `nm_inet_parse_str()`, `nm_inet_is_normalized()`. <<<< R() { git grep -l "$1" | xargs sed -i "s/\<$1\>/$2/g" } R NM_CMP_DIRECT_IN4ADDR_SAME_PREFIX NM_CMP_DIRECT_IP4_ADDR_SAME_PREFIX R NM_CMP_DIRECT_IN6ADDR_SAME_PREFIX NM_CMP_DIRECT_IP6_ADDR_SAME_PREFIX R NM_UTILS_INET_ADDRSTRLEN NM_INET_ADDRSTRLEN R _nm_utils_inet4_ntop nm_inet4_ntop R _nm_utils_inet6_ntop nm_inet6_ntop R _nm_utils_ip4_get_default_prefix nm_ip4_addr_get_default_prefix R _nm_utils_ip4_get_default_prefix0 nm_ip4_addr_get_default_prefix0 R _nm_utils_ip4_netmask_to_prefix nm_ip4_addr_netmask_to_prefix R _nm_utils_ip4_prefix_to_netmask nm_ip4_addr_netmask_from_prefix R nm_utils_inet4_ntop_dup nm_inet4_ntop_dup R nm_utils_inet6_ntop_dup nm_inet6_ntop_dup R nm_utils_inet_ntop nm_inet_ntop R nm_utils_inet_ntop_dup nm_inet_ntop_dup R nm_utils_ip4_address_clear_host_address nm_ip4_addr_clear_host_address R nm_utils_ip4_address_is_link_local nm_ip4_addr_is_link_local R nm_utils_ip4_address_is_loopback nm_ip4_addr_is_loopback R nm_utils_ip4_address_is_zeronet nm_ip4_addr_is_zeronet R nm_utils_ip4_address_same_prefix nm_ip4_addr_same_prefix R nm_utils_ip4_address_same_prefix_cmp nm_ip4_addr_same_prefix_cmp R nm_utils_ip6_address_clear_host_address nm_ip6_addr_clear_host_address R nm_utils_ip6_address_same_prefix nm_ip6_addr_same_prefix R nm_utils_ip6_address_same_prefix_cmp nm_ip6_addr_same_prefix_cmp R nm_utils_ip6_is_ula nm_ip6_addr_is_ula R nm_utils_ip_address_same_prefix nm_ip_addr_same_prefix R nm_utils_ip_address_same_prefix_cmp nm_ip_addr_same_prefix_cmp R nm_utils_ip_is_site_local nm_ip_addr_is_site_local R nm_utils_ipaddr_is_normalized nm_inet_is_normalized R nm_utils_ipaddr_is_valid nm_inet_is_valid R nm_utils_ipx_address_clear_host_address nm_ip_addr_clear_host_address R nm_utils_parse_inaddr nm_inet_parse_str R nm_utils_parse_inaddr_bin nm_inet_parse_bin R nm_utils_parse_inaddr_bin_full nm_inet_parse_bin_full R nm_utils_parse_inaddr_prefix nm_inet_parse_with_prefix_str R nm_utils_parse_inaddr_prefix_bin nm_inet_parse_with_prefix_bin R test_nm_utils_ip6_address_same_prefix test_nm_ip_addr_same_prefix ./contrib/scripts/nm-code-format.sh -F
2022-08-19 13:15:20 +02:00
netmask = nm_ip4_addr_netmask_from_prefix(plen);
l = g_snprintf(buf,
_SHARE_IPTABLES_SUBNET_TO_STR_LEN,
"%s/%u",
glib-aux: rename IP address related helpers from "nm-inet-utils.h" - name things related to `in_addr_t`, `struct in6_addr`, `NMIPAddr` as `nm_ip4_addr_*()`, `nm_ip6_addr_*()`, `nm_ip_addr_*()`, respectively. - we have a wrapper `nm_inet_ntop()` for `inet_ntop()`. This name of our wrapper is chosen to be familiar with the libc underlying function. With this, also name functions that are about string representations of addresses `nm_inet_*()`, `nm_inet4_*()`, `nm_inet6_*()`. For example, `nm_inet_parse_str()`, `nm_inet_is_normalized()`. <<<< R() { git grep -l "$1" | xargs sed -i "s/\<$1\>/$2/g" } R NM_CMP_DIRECT_IN4ADDR_SAME_PREFIX NM_CMP_DIRECT_IP4_ADDR_SAME_PREFIX R NM_CMP_DIRECT_IN6ADDR_SAME_PREFIX NM_CMP_DIRECT_IP6_ADDR_SAME_PREFIX R NM_UTILS_INET_ADDRSTRLEN NM_INET_ADDRSTRLEN R _nm_utils_inet4_ntop nm_inet4_ntop R _nm_utils_inet6_ntop nm_inet6_ntop R _nm_utils_ip4_get_default_prefix nm_ip4_addr_get_default_prefix R _nm_utils_ip4_get_default_prefix0 nm_ip4_addr_get_default_prefix0 R _nm_utils_ip4_netmask_to_prefix nm_ip4_addr_netmask_to_prefix R _nm_utils_ip4_prefix_to_netmask nm_ip4_addr_netmask_from_prefix R nm_utils_inet4_ntop_dup nm_inet4_ntop_dup R nm_utils_inet6_ntop_dup nm_inet6_ntop_dup R nm_utils_inet_ntop nm_inet_ntop R nm_utils_inet_ntop_dup nm_inet_ntop_dup R nm_utils_ip4_address_clear_host_address nm_ip4_addr_clear_host_address R nm_utils_ip4_address_is_link_local nm_ip4_addr_is_link_local R nm_utils_ip4_address_is_loopback nm_ip4_addr_is_loopback R nm_utils_ip4_address_is_zeronet nm_ip4_addr_is_zeronet R nm_utils_ip4_address_same_prefix nm_ip4_addr_same_prefix R nm_utils_ip4_address_same_prefix_cmp nm_ip4_addr_same_prefix_cmp R nm_utils_ip6_address_clear_host_address nm_ip6_addr_clear_host_address R nm_utils_ip6_address_same_prefix nm_ip6_addr_same_prefix R nm_utils_ip6_address_same_prefix_cmp nm_ip6_addr_same_prefix_cmp R nm_utils_ip6_is_ula nm_ip6_addr_is_ula R nm_utils_ip_address_same_prefix nm_ip_addr_same_prefix R nm_utils_ip_address_same_prefix_cmp nm_ip_addr_same_prefix_cmp R nm_utils_ip_is_site_local nm_ip_addr_is_site_local R nm_utils_ipaddr_is_normalized nm_inet_is_normalized R nm_utils_ipaddr_is_valid nm_inet_is_valid R nm_utils_ipx_address_clear_host_address nm_ip_addr_clear_host_address R nm_utils_parse_inaddr nm_inet_parse_str R nm_utils_parse_inaddr_bin nm_inet_parse_bin R nm_utils_parse_inaddr_bin_full nm_inet_parse_bin_full R nm_utils_parse_inaddr_prefix nm_inet_parse_with_prefix_str R nm_utils_parse_inaddr_prefix_bin nm_inet_parse_with_prefix_bin R test_nm_utils_ip6_address_same_prefix test_nm_ip_addr_same_prefix ./contrib/scripts/nm-code-format.sh -F
2022-08-19 13:15:20 +02:00
nm_inet4_ntop(addr & netmask, buf_addr),
plen);
nm_assert(l < _SHARE_IPTABLES_SUBNET_TO_STR_LEN);
return buf;
}
static char *
_share_iptables_get_name(gboolean is_iptables_chain, const char *prefix, const char *ip_iface)
{
NMStrBuf strbuf = NM_STR_BUF_INIT(NM_UTILS_GET_NEXT_REALLOC_SIZE_40, FALSE);
gsize ip_iface_len;
nm_assert(prefix);
nm_assert(ip_iface);
/* This function is used to generate iptables chain names and comments.
* Chain names must be shorter than 29 chars. Comments don't have this
* limitation.
*
* Below we sanitize the ip_iface. If it's all benign, we use
* - either "-$IP_IFACE" (at most 16 chars)
* - otherwise, we base64 encode the name as "$(base64 $IP_IFACE)", at
* most 20 chars.
*
* Since for benign names we already add a '-', prefix probably should not
* contain a '-'. The '-' is necessary to distinguish between base64 encoding
* an plain name.
*
* That means, for chain names the prefix must be at most 8 chars long. */
nm_assert(!is_iptables_chain || (strlen(prefix) <= 8));
nm_str_buf_append(&strbuf, prefix);
ip_iface_len = strlen(ip_iface);
G_STATIC_ASSERT_EXPR(NMP_IFNAMSIZ == 16);
if (ip_iface_len >= NMP_IFNAMSIZ) {
nm_assert_not_reached();
ip_iface_len = NMP_IFNAMSIZ - 1;
}
if (NM_STRCHAR_ALL(ip_iface,
ch,
(ch >= '0' && ch <= '9') || (ch >= 'a' && ch <= 'z')
|| (ch >= 'A' && ch <= 'Z') || NM_IN_SET(ch, '.', '_', '-', '+'))) {
nm_str_buf_append_c(&strbuf, '-');
nm_str_buf_append(&strbuf, ip_iface);
} else {
gs_free char *s = NULL;
s = g_base64_encode((const guchar *) ip_iface, ip_iface_len);
nm_str_buf_append(&strbuf, s);
}
return nm_str_buf_finalize(&strbuf, NULL);
}
static gboolean
_share_iptables_call_v(const char *const *argv)
{
gs_free_error GError *error = NULL;
gs_free char *argv_str = NULL;
int status;
nm_log_dbg(LOGD_SHARING, "iptables: %s", (argv_str = g_strjoinv(" ", (char **) argv)));
if (!g_spawn_sync("/",
(char **) argv,
(char **) NM_PTRARRAY_EMPTY(const char *),
G_SPAWN_STDOUT_TO_DEV_NULL | G_SPAWN_STDERR_TO_DEV_NULL,
NULL,
NULL,
NULL,
NULL,
&status,
&error)) {
nm_log_warn(LOGD_SHARING,
"iptables: error executing command %s: %s",
argv[0],
error->message);
return FALSE;
}
if (!g_spawn_check_exit_status(status, &error)) {
nm_log_warn(LOGD_SHARING, "iptables: command %s failed: %s", argv[0], error->message);
return FALSE;
}
return TRUE;
}
#define _share_iptables_call(...) _share_iptables_call_v(NM_MAKE_STRV(__VA_ARGS__))
static gboolean
_share_iptables_chain_op(const char *table, const char *chain, const char *op)
{
return _share_iptables_call("" IPTABLES_PATH "", "--table", table, op, chain);
}
static gboolean
_share_iptables_chain_delete(const char *table, const char *chain)
{
_share_iptables_chain_op(table, chain, "--flush");
return _share_iptables_chain_op(table, chain, "--delete-chain");
}
static gboolean
_share_iptables_chain_add(const char *table, const char *chain)
{
if (_share_iptables_chain_op(table, chain, "--new-chain"))
return TRUE;
_share_iptables_chain_delete(table, chain);
return _share_iptables_chain_op(table, chain, "--new-chain");
}
static void
_share_iptables_set_masquerade(gboolean up, const char *ip_iface, in_addr_t addr, guint8 plen)
{
char str_subnet[_SHARE_IPTABLES_SUBNET_TO_STR_LEN];
gs_free char *comment_name = NULL;
comment_name = _share_iptables_get_name(FALSE, "nm-shared", ip_iface);
_share_iptables_subnet_to_str(str_subnet, addr, plen);
_share_iptables_call("" IPTABLES_PATH "",
"--table",
"nat",
up ? "--insert" : "--delete",
"POSTROUTING",
"--source",
str_subnet,
"!",
"--destination",
str_subnet,
"--jump",
"MASQUERADE",
"-m",
"comment",
"--comment",
comment_name);
}
static void
_share_iptables_set_shared_chains_add(const char *chain_input,
const char *chain_forward,
const char *ip_iface,
in_addr_t addr,
guint plen)
{
const char *const input_params[][2] = {
{
"tcp",
"67",
},
{
"udp",
"67",
},
{
"tcp",
"53",
},
{
"udp",
"53",
},
};
char str_subnet[_SHARE_IPTABLES_SUBNET_TO_STR_LEN];
int i;
_share_iptables_subnet_to_str(str_subnet, addr, plen);
_share_iptables_chain_add("filter", chain_input);
for (i = 0; i < (int) G_N_ELEMENTS(input_params); i++) {
_share_iptables_call("" IPTABLES_PATH "",
"--table",
"filter",
"--append",
chain_input,
"--protocol",
input_params[i][0],
"--destination-port",
input_params[i][1],
"--jump",
"ACCEPT");
}
_share_iptables_chain_add("filter", chain_forward);
_share_iptables_call("" IPTABLES_PATH "",
"--table",
"filter",
"--append",
chain_forward,
"--destination",
str_subnet,
"--out-interface",
ip_iface,
"--match",
"state",
"--state",
"ESTABLISHED,RELATED",
"--jump",
"ACCEPT");
_share_iptables_call("" IPTABLES_PATH "",
"--table",
"filter",
"--append",
chain_forward,
"--source",
str_subnet,
"--in-interface",
ip_iface,
"--jump",
"ACCEPT");
_share_iptables_call("" IPTABLES_PATH "",
"--table",
"filter",
"--append",
chain_forward,
"--in-interface",
ip_iface,
"--out-interface",
ip_iface,
"--jump",
"ACCEPT");
_share_iptables_call("" IPTABLES_PATH "",
"--table",
"filter",
"--append",
chain_forward,
"--out-interface",
ip_iface,
"--jump",
"REJECT");
_share_iptables_call("" IPTABLES_PATH "",
"--table",
"filter",
"--append",
chain_forward,
"--in-interface",
ip_iface,
"--jump",
"REJECT");
}
static void
_share_iptables_set_shared_chains_delete(const char *chain_input, const char *chain_forward)
{
_share_iptables_chain_delete("filter", chain_input);
_share_iptables_chain_delete("filter", chain_forward);
}
_nm_unused static void
_share_iptables_set_shared(gboolean up, const char *ip_iface, in_addr_t addr, guint plen)
{
gs_free char *comment_name = NULL;
gs_free char *chain_input = NULL;
gs_free char *chain_forward = NULL;
comment_name = _share_iptables_get_name(FALSE, "nm-shared", ip_iface);
chain_input = _share_iptables_get_name(TRUE, "nm-sh-in", ip_iface);
chain_forward = _share_iptables_get_name(TRUE, "nm-sh-fw", ip_iface);
if (up)
_share_iptables_set_shared_chains_add(chain_input, chain_forward, ip_iface, addr, plen);
_share_iptables_call("" IPTABLES_PATH "",
"--table",
"filter",
up ? "--insert" : "--delete",
"INPUT",
"--in-interface",
ip_iface,
"--jump",
chain_input,
"-m",
"comment",
"--comment",
comment_name);
_share_iptables_call("" IPTABLES_PATH "",
"--table",
"filter",
up ? "--insert" : "--delete",
"FORWARD",
"--jump",
chain_forward,
"-m",
"comment",
"--comment",
comment_name);
if (!up)
_share_iptables_set_shared_chains_delete(chain_input, chain_forward);
}
/*****************************************************************************/
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
typedef struct {
GTask *task;
GSubprocess *subprocess;
GSource *timeout_source;
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
GCancellable *intern_cancellable;
char *identifier;
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
gulong cancellable_id;
} FwNftCallData;
static void
_fw_nft_call_data_free(FwNftCallData *call_data, GError *error_take)
{
nm_clear_g_signal_handler(g_task_get_cancellable(call_data->task), &call_data->cancellable_id);
nm_clear_g_cancellable(&call_data->intern_cancellable);
nm_clear_g_source_inst(&call_data->timeout_source);
if (error_take)
g_task_return_error(call_data->task, error_take);
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
else
g_task_return_boolean(call_data->task, TRUE);
g_object_unref(call_data->task);
nm_g_object_unref(call_data->subprocess);
g_free(call_data->identifier);
nm_g_slice_free(call_data);
}
static void
_fw_nft_call_communicate_cb(GObject *source, GAsyncResult *result, gpointer user_data)
{
FwNftCallData *call_data = user_data;
gs_free_error GError *error = NULL;
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
gs_unref_bytes GBytes *stdout_buf = NULL;
gs_unref_bytes GBytes *stderr_buf = NULL;
nm_assert(source == (gpointer) call_data->subprocess);
if (!g_subprocess_communicate_finish(G_SUBPROCESS(source),
result,
&stdout_buf,
&stderr_buf,
&error)) {
/* on any error, the process might still be running. We need to abort it in
* the background... */
if (!nm_utils_error_is_cancelled(error)) {
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
nm_log_dbg(LOGD_SHARING,
"firewall: nft[%s]: communication failed: %s. Kill process",
call_data->identifier,
error->message);
} else if (!call_data->timeout_source) {
nm_log_dbg(LOGD_SHARING,
"firewall: ntf[%s]: communication timed out. Kill process",
call_data->identifier);
nm_clear_error(&error);
nm_utils_error_set(&error, NM_UTILS_ERROR_UNKNOWN, "timeout communicating with nft");
} else {
nm_log_dbg(LOGD_SHARING,
"firewall: ntf[%s]: communication cancelled. Kill process",
call_data->identifier);
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
}
{
_nm_unused nm_auto_pop_gmaincontext GMainContext *main_context =
nm_g_main_context_push_thread_default_if_necessary(NULL);
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
nm_shutdown_wait_obj_register_object(call_data->subprocess, "nft-terminate");
G_STATIC_ASSERT_EXPR(200 < NM_SHUTDOWN_TIMEOUT_ADDITIONAL_MSEC * 2 / 3);
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
nm_g_subprocess_terminate_in_background(call_data->subprocess, 200);
}
} else if (g_subprocess_get_successful(call_data->subprocess)) {
nm_log_dbg(LOGD_SHARING, "firewall: nft[%s]: command successful", call_data->identifier);
} else {
gs_free char *ss_stdout = NULL;
gs_free char *ss_stderr = NULL;
gboolean print_stdout = (stdout_buf && g_bytes_get_size(stdout_buf) > 0);
gboolean print_stderr = (stderr_buf && g_bytes_get_size(stderr_buf) > 0);
nm_log_warn(LOGD_SHARING,
"firewall: nft[%s]: command failed:%s%s%s%s%s%s%s",
call_data->identifier,
print_stdout || print_stderr ? "" : " unknown reason",
NM_PRINT_FMT_QUOTED(
print_stdout,
" (stdout: \"",
nm_utils_buf_utf8safe_escape_bytes(stdout_buf,
NM_UTILS_STR_UTF8_SAFE_FLAG_ESCAPE_CTRL,
&ss_stdout),
"\")",
""),
NM_PRINT_FMT_QUOTED(
print_stderr,
" (stderr: \"",
nm_utils_buf_utf8safe_escape_bytes(stderr_buf,
NM_UTILS_STR_UTF8_SAFE_FLAG_ESCAPE_CTRL,
&ss_stderr),
"\")",
""));
}
_fw_nft_call_data_free(call_data, g_steal_pointer(&error));
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
}
static void
_fw_nft_call_cancelled_cb(GCancellable *cancellable, gpointer user_data)
{
FwNftCallData *call_data = user_data;
if (call_data->cancellable_id == 0)
return;
nm_log_dbg(LOGD_SHARING, "firewall: nft[%s]: operation cancelled", call_data->identifier);
nm_clear_g_signal_handler(g_task_get_cancellable(call_data->task), &call_data->cancellable_id);
nm_clear_g_cancellable(&call_data->intern_cancellable);
}
static gboolean
_fw_nft_call_timeout_cb(gpointer user_data)
{
FwNftCallData *call_data = user_data;
nm_clear_g_source_inst(&call_data->timeout_source);
nm_log_dbg(LOGD_SHARING,
"firewall: nft[%s]: cancel operation after timeout",
call_data->identifier);
nm_clear_g_cancellable(&call_data->intern_cancellable);
return G_SOURCE_CONTINUE;
}
static void
_fw_nft_call(GBytes *stdin_buf,
GCancellable *cancellable,
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
GAsyncReadyCallback callback,
gpointer callback_user_data)
{
gs_unref_object GSubprocessLauncher *subprocess_launcher = NULL;
gs_free_error GError *error = NULL;
FwNftCallData *call_data;
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
call_data = g_slice_new(FwNftCallData);
*call_data = (FwNftCallData){
.task = nm_g_task_new(NULL, cancellable, _fw_nft_call, callback, callback_user_data),
.subprocess = NULL,
.timeout_source = NULL,
};
if (cancellable) {
call_data->cancellable_id = g_cancellable_connect(cancellable,
G_CALLBACK(_fw_nft_call_cancelled_cb),
call_data,
NULL);
if (call_data->cancellable_id == 0) {
nm_log_dbg(LOGD_SHARING, "firewall: nft: already cancelled");
nm_utils_error_set_cancelled(&error, FALSE, NULL);
_fw_nft_call_data_free(call_data, g_steal_pointer(&error));
return;
}
}
subprocess_launcher =
g_subprocess_launcher_new(G_SUBPROCESS_FLAGS_STDIN_PIPE | G_SUBPROCESS_FLAGS_STDOUT_PIPE
| G_SUBPROCESS_FLAGS_STDERR_PIPE);
g_subprocess_launcher_set_environ(subprocess_launcher, NM_STRV_EMPTY());
call_data->subprocess = g_subprocess_launcher_spawnv(subprocess_launcher,
NM_MAKE_STRV(NFT_PATH, "-f", "-"),
&error);
if (!call_data->subprocess) {
nm_log_dbg(LOGD_SHARING, "firewall: nft: spawning nft failed: %s", error->message);
_fw_nft_call_data_free(call_data, g_steal_pointer(&error));
return;
}
call_data->identifier = g_strdup(g_subprocess_get_identifier(call_data->subprocess));
nm_log_dbg(LOGD_SHARING, "firewall: nft[%s]: communicate with nft", call_data->identifier);
nm_shutdown_wait_obj_register_object(call_data->task, "nft-call");
call_data->intern_cancellable = g_cancellable_new(),
g_subprocess_communicate_async(call_data->subprocess,
stdin_buf,
call_data->intern_cancellable,
_fw_nft_call_communicate_cb,
call_data);
call_data->timeout_source =
nm_g_source_attach(nm_g_timeout_source_new((NM_SHUTDOWN_TIMEOUT_1500_MSEC * 2) / 3,
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT,
_fw_nft_call_timeout_cb,
call_data,
NULL),
g_task_get_context(call_data->task));
}
static gboolean
_fw_nft_call_finish(GAsyncResult *result, GError **error)
{
g_return_val_if_fail(nm_g_task_is_valid(result, NULL, _fw_nft_call), FALSE);
return g_task_propagate_boolean(G_TASK(result), error);
}
/*****************************************************************************/
typedef struct {
GMainLoop *loop;
GError **error;
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
gboolean success;
} FwNftCallSyncData;
static void
_fw_nft_call_sync_done(GObject *source, GAsyncResult *result, gpointer user_data)
{
FwNftCallSyncData *data = user_data;
data->success = _fw_nft_call_finish(result, data->error);
g_main_loop_quit(data->loop);
}
static gboolean
_fw_nft_call_sync(GBytes *stdin_buf, GError **error)
{
nm_auto_pop_and_unref_gmaincontext GMainContext *main_context =
nm_g_main_context_push_thread_default(g_main_context_new());
nm_auto_unref_gmainloop GMainLoop *main_loop = g_main_loop_new(main_context, FALSE);
FwNftCallSyncData data = (FwNftCallSyncData){
.loop = main_loop,
.error = error,
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
};
_fw_nft_call(stdin_buf, NULL, _fw_nft_call_sync_done, &data);
g_main_loop_run(main_loop);
return data.success;
}
/*****************************************************************************/
static void
_fw_nft_set_shared(gboolean up, const char *ip_iface, in_addr_t addr, guint8 plen)
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
{
nm_auto_str_buf NMStrBuf strbuf = NM_STR_BUF_INIT(NM_UTILS_GET_NEXT_REALLOC_SIZE_1000, FALSE);
gs_unref_bytes GBytes *stdin_buf = NULL;
gs_free char *table_name = NULL;
gs_free char *ss1 = NULL;
char str_subnet[_SHARE_IPTABLES_SUBNET_TO_STR_LEN];
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
table_name = _share_iptables_get_name(FALSE, "nm-shared", ip_iface);
_share_iptables_subnet_to_str(str_subnet, addr, plen);
#define _append(p_strbuf, fmt, ...) nm_str_buf_append_printf((p_strbuf), "" fmt "\n", ##__VA_ARGS__)
_append(&strbuf, "add table ip %s", table_name);
_append(&strbuf, "%s table ip %s", up ? "flush" : "delete", table_name);
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
if (up) {
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
_append(&strbuf,
"add chain ip %s nat_postrouting {"
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
" type nat hook postrouting priority 100; policy accept; "
"};",
table_name);
_append(&strbuf,
"add rule ip %s nat_postrouting ip saddr %s ip daddr != %s masquerade;",
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
table_name,
str_subnet,
str_subnet);
/* This filter_input chain serves no real purpose, because "accept" only stops
* evaluation of the current rule. It cannot fully accept the packet. Since
* this chain has no other rules, it is useless in this form.
*/
/*
_append(&strbuf,
"add chain ip %s filter_input {"
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
" type filter hook input priority 0; policy accept; "
"};",
table_name);
_append(&strbuf, "add rule ip %s filter_input tcp dport { 67, 53 } accept;", table_name);
_append(&strbuf, "add rule ip %s filter_input udp dport { 67, 53 } accept;", table_name);
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
*/
_append(&strbuf,
"add chain ip %s filter_forward {"
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
" type filter hook forward priority 0; policy accept; "
"};",
table_name);
_append(&strbuf,
"add rule ip %s filter_forward ip daddr %s oifname \"%s\" "
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
" ct state { established, related } accept;",
table_name,
str_subnet,
ip_iface);
_append(&strbuf,
"add rule ip %s filter_forward ip saddr %s iifname \"%s\" accept;",
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
table_name,
str_subnet,
ip_iface);
_append(&strbuf,
"add rule ip %s filter_forward iifname \"%s\" oifname \"%s\" accept;",
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
table_name,
ip_iface,
ip_iface);
_append(&strbuf,
"add rule ip %s filter_forward iifname \"%s\" reject;",
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
table_name,
ip_iface);
_append(&strbuf,
"add rule ip %s filter_forward oifname \"%s\" reject;",
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
table_name,
ip_iface);
}
nm_log_trace(LOGD_SHARING,
"firewall: nft command: [ %s ]",
nm_utils_str_utf8safe_escape(nm_str_buf_get_str(&strbuf),
NM_UTILS_STR_UTF8_SAFE_FLAG_ESCAPE_CTRL,
&ss1));
stdin_buf = nm_str_buf_finalize_to_gbytes(&strbuf);
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
_fw_nft_call_sync(stdin_buf, NULL);
}
/*****************************************************************************/
struct _NMFirewallConfig {
char *ip_iface;
in_addr_t addr;
guint8 plen;
};
NMFirewallConfig *
nm_firewall_config_new_shared(const char *ip_iface, in_addr_t addr, guint8 plen)
{
NMFirewallConfig *self;
nm_assert(ip_iface);
nm_assert(addr != 0u);
nm_assert(plen <= 32);
self = g_slice_new(NMFirewallConfig);
*self = (NMFirewallConfig){
.ip_iface = g_strdup(ip_iface),
.addr = addr,
.plen = plen,
};
return self;
}
void
nm_firewall_config_free(NMFirewallConfig *self)
{
if (!self)
return;
g_free(self->ip_iface);
nm_g_slice_free(self);
}
void
nm_firewall_config_apply(NMFirewallConfig *self, gboolean up)
{
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
switch (nm_firewall_utils_get_backend()) {
case NM_FIREWALL_BACKEND_IPTABLES:
_share_iptables_set_masquerade(up, self->ip_iface, self->addr, self->plen);
_share_iptables_set_shared(up, self->ip_iface, self->addr, self->plen);
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
break;
case NM_FIREWALL_BACKEND_NFTABLES:
_fw_nft_set_shared(up, self->ip_iface, self->addr, self->plen);
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
break;
case NM_FIREWALL_BACKEND_NONE:
break;
firewall: implement masquerading for shared mode with nftables Add support for nftables, as a second backend beside iptables (firewalld still missing). Like iptables, choose to call the `nft` tool. The alternative would be to use libnftables or talk netlink. It's ugly to blocking wait for a process to complete. We already do that for iptables, but we better should not because we should not treat other processes as trusted and not allow untrusted code to block NetworkManager. Fixing that would require a central manager that serializes all requests. Especially with firewalld support, this will be interesting again, because we don't want to synchronously talk D-Bus either. For now, `nft` is still called synchronously. However, the internal implementation uses an asynchronous function. That currently serves no purpose except supporting a timeout. Otherwise, the only reason why this is asynchronous is that I implemented this first, and I think in the future we want this code to be non-blocking. So, instead of dropping the asynchronous code, I wrap it in a synchronous function for now. The configured nft table is: table inet nm-shared-eth0 { chain nat_postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.42.0/24 masquerade } chain filter_forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; ip daddr 192.168.42.0/24 oifname "eth0" ct state { established, related } accept ip saddr 192.168.42.0/24 iifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" oifname "eth0" accept iifname "eth0" reject oifname "eth0" reject } }
2021-05-12 12:01:12 +02:00
default:
nm_assert_not_reached();
break;
}
}
/*****************************************************************************/
static NMFirewallBackend
_firewall_backend_detect(void)
{
if (g_file_test(NFT_PATH, G_FILE_TEST_IS_EXECUTABLE))
return NM_FIREWALL_BACKEND_NFTABLES;
if (g_file_test(IPTABLES_PATH, G_FILE_TEST_IS_EXECUTABLE))
return NM_FIREWALL_BACKEND_IPTABLES;
return NM_FIREWALL_BACKEND_NFTABLES;
}
NMFirewallBackend
nm_firewall_utils_get_backend(void)
{
static int backend = NM_FIREWALL_BACKEND_UNKNOWN;
int b;
again:
b = g_atomic_int_get(&backend);
if (b == NM_FIREWALL_BACKEND_UNKNOWN) {
gs_free char *conf_value = NULL;
gboolean detect;
int i;
conf_value =
nm_config_data_get_value(NM_CONFIG_GET_DATA_ORIG,
NM_CONFIG_KEYFILE_GROUP_MAIN,
NM_CONFIG_KEYFILE_KEY_MAIN_FIREWALL_BACKEND,
NM_CONFIG_GET_VALUE_STRIP | NM_CONFIG_GET_VALUE_NO_EMPTY);
if (conf_value) {
for (i = 0; i < (int) G_N_ELEMENTS(FirewallBackends); i++) {
if (!g_ascii_strcasecmp(conf_value, FirewallBackends[i].name)) {
b = (i + 1);
break;
}
}
}
detect = (b == NM_FIREWALL_BACKEND_UNKNOWN);
if (detect)
b = _firewall_backend_detect();
nm_assert(NM_IN_SET(b,
NM_FIREWALL_BACKEND_NONE,
NM_FIREWALL_BACKEND_IPTABLES,
NM_FIREWALL_BACKEND_NFTABLES));
if (!g_atomic_int_compare_and_exchange(&backend, NM_FIREWALL_BACKEND_UNKNOWN, b))
goto again;
nm_log_dbg(LOGD_SHARING,
"firewall: use %s backend%s%s%s%s%s%s%s",
FirewallBackends[b - 1].name,
NM_PRINT_FMT_QUOTED(FirewallBackends[b - 1].path,
" (",
FirewallBackends[b - 1].path,
")",
""),
detect ? " (detected)" : "",
NM_PRINT_FMT_QUOTED(detect && conf_value,
" (invalid setting \"",
conf_value,
"\")",
""));
}
nm_assert(NM_IN_SET(b,
NM_FIREWALL_BACKEND_NONE,
NM_FIREWALL_BACKEND_IPTABLES,
NM_FIREWALL_BACKEND_NFTABLES));
return b;
}