2019-09-10 11:19:01 +02:00
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1+
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2019-10-01 09:20:35 +02:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2007 - 2008 Novell, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2007 - 2014 Red Hat, Inc.
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
all: fix up multiple-include-guard defines
Previously, src/nm-ip4-config.h, libnm/nm-ip4-config.h, and
libnm-glib/nm-ip4-config.h all used "NM_IP4_CONFIG_H" as an include
guard, which meant that nm-test-utils.h could not tell which of them
was being included (and so, eg, if you tried to include
nm-ip4-config.h in a libnm test, it would fail to compile because
nm-test-utils.h was referring to symbols in src/nm-ip4-config.h).
Fix this by changing the include guards in the non-API-stable parts of
the tree:
- libnm-glib/nm-ip4-config.h remains NM_IP4_CONFIG_H
- libnm/nm-ip4-config.h now uses __NM_IP4_CONFIG_H__
- src/nm-ip4-config.h now uses __NETWORKMANAGER_IP4_CONFIG_H__
And likewise for all other headers.
The two non-"nm"-prefixed headers, libnm/NetworkManager.h and
src/NetworkManagerUtils.h are now __NETWORKMANAGER_H__ and
__NETWORKMANAGER_UTILS_H__ respectively, which, while not entirely
consistent with the general scheme, do still mostly make sense in
isolation.
2014-08-13 14:10:11 -04:00
|
|
|
#ifndef __NM_CLIENT_H__
|
|
|
|
|
#define __NM_CLIENT_H__
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2014-07-06 16:53:02 -04:00
|
|
|
#if !defined (__NETWORKMANAGER_H_INSIDE__) && !defined (NETWORKMANAGER_COMPILATION)
|
|
|
|
|
#error "Only <NetworkManager.h> can be included directly."
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-09 13:02:20 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "nm-types.h"
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G_BEGIN_DECLS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_TYPE_CLIENT (nm_client_get_type ())
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT(obj) (G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE_CAST ((obj), NM_TYPE_CLIENT, NMClient))
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_CLASS(klass) (G_TYPE_CHECK_CLASS_CAST ((klass), NM_TYPE_CLIENT, NMClientClass))
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_IS_CLIENT(obj) (G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE_TYPE ((obj), NM_TYPE_CLIENT))
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_IS_CLIENT_CLASS(klass) (G_TYPE_CHECK_CLASS_TYPE ((klass), NM_TYPE_CLIENT))
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_GET_CLASS(obj) (G_TYPE_INSTANCE_GET_CLASS ((obj), NM_TYPE_CLIENT, NMClientClass))
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-12 14:59:23 +02:00
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_VERSION "version"
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_STATE "state"
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_STARTUP "startup"
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_NM_RUNNING "nm-running"
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_DBUS_CONNECTION "dbus-connection"
|
2019-10-15 16:08:36 +02:00
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_DBUS_NAME_OWNER "dbus-name-owner"
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_NM_DEPRECATED_SYNC_WRITABLE_PROPERTY
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED "networking-enabled"
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_NM_DEPRECATED_SYNC_WRITABLE_PROPERTY
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_WIRELESS_ENABLED "wireless-enabled"
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
_NM_DEPRECATED_SYNC_WRITABLE_PROPERTY
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_WWAN_ENABLED "wwan-enabled"
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
_NM_DEPRECATED_SYNC_WRITABLE_PROPERTY
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_WIMAX_ENABLED "wimax-enabled"
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_WIRELESS_HARDWARE_ENABLED "wireless-hardware-enabled"
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_WWAN_HARDWARE_ENABLED "wwan-hardware-enabled"
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_WIMAX_HARDWARE_ENABLED "wimax-hardware-enabled"
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_ACTIVE_CONNECTIONS "active-connections"
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_CONNECTIVITY "connectivity"
|
2017-08-09 15:21:28 +08:00
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_CONNECTIVITY_CHECK_AVAILABLE "connectivity-check-available"
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_NM_DEPRECATED_SYNC_WRITABLE_PROPERTY
|
2017-08-09 15:21:28 +08:00
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_CONNECTIVITY_CHECK_ENABLED "connectivity-check-enabled"
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_PRIMARY_CONNECTION "primary-connection"
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_ACTIVATING_CONNECTION "activating-connection"
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_DEVICES "devices"
|
2014-10-10 14:28:49 -05:00
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_ALL_DEVICES "all-devices"
|
2014-09-29 10:58:16 -04:00
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_CONNECTIONS "connections"
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_HOSTNAME "hostname"
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_CAN_MODIFY "can-modify"
|
2015-06-03 09:15:24 +02:00
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_METERED "metered"
|
2016-10-25 11:11:12 +02:00
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_DNS_MODE "dns-mode"
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_DNS_RC_MANAGER "dns-rc-manager"
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_DNS_CONFIGURATION "dns-configuration"
|
2014-09-29 10:58:16 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_DEVICE_ADDED "device-added"
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_DEVICE_REMOVED "device-removed"
|
2014-10-10 14:28:49 -05:00
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_ANY_DEVICE_ADDED "any-device-added"
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_ANY_DEVICE_REMOVED "any-device-removed"
|
2014-09-29 10:58:16 -04:00
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_CHANGED "permission-changed"
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_CONNECTION_ADDED "connection-added"
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_CONNECTION_REMOVED "connection-removed"
|
2016-07-07 11:35:19 +02:00
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_ACTIVE_CONNECTION_ADDED "active-connection-added"
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_ACTIVE_CONNECTION_REMOVED "active-connection-removed"
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
|
* NMClientPermission:
|
|
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_NONE: unknown or no permission
|
|
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_ENABLE_DISABLE_NETWORK: controls whether networking
|
|
|
|
|
* can be globally enabled or disabled
|
|
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_ENABLE_DISABLE_WIFI: controls whether Wi-Fi can be
|
|
|
|
|
* globally enabled or disabled
|
|
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_ENABLE_DISABLE_WWAN: controls whether WWAN (3G) can be
|
|
|
|
|
* globally enabled or disabled
|
|
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_ENABLE_DISABLE_WIMAX: controls whether WiMAX can be
|
|
|
|
|
* globally enabled or disabled
|
|
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_SLEEP_WAKE: controls whether the client can ask
|
|
|
|
|
* NetworkManager to sleep and wake
|
|
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_NETWORK_CONTROL: controls whether networking connections
|
|
|
|
|
* can be started, stopped, and changed
|
|
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_WIFI_SHARE_PROTECTED: controls whether a password
|
|
|
|
|
* protected Wi-Fi hotspot can be created
|
|
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_WIFI_SHARE_OPEN: controls whether an open Wi-Fi hotspot
|
|
|
|
|
* can be created
|
|
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_SETTINGS_MODIFY_SYSTEM: controls whether connections
|
|
|
|
|
* that are available to all users can be modified
|
|
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_SETTINGS_MODIFY_OWN: controls whether connections
|
|
|
|
|
* owned by the current user can be modified
|
|
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_SETTINGS_MODIFY_HOSTNAME: controls whether the
|
|
|
|
|
* persistent hostname can be changed
|
2016-06-01 12:54:05 +02:00
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_SETTINGS_MODIFY_GLOBAL_DNS: modify persistent global
|
|
|
|
|
* DNS configuration
|
2016-05-30 15:42:44 +02:00
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_RELOAD: controls access to Reload.
|
2016-08-17 15:34:55 +02:00
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_CHECKPOINT_ROLLBACK: permission to create checkpoints.
|
2016-08-10 11:54:32 +02:00
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_ENABLE_DISABLE_STATISTICS: controls whether device
|
|
|
|
|
* statistics can be globally enabled or disabled
|
2017-08-17 23:08:44 +02:00
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_ENABLE_DISABLE_CONNECTIVITY_CHECK: controls whether
|
|
|
|
|
* connectivity check can be enabled or disabled
|
2019-01-25 14:33:11 +08:00
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_WIFI_SCAN: controls whether wifi scans can be performed
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_LAST: a reserved boundary value
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* #NMClientPermission values indicate various permissions that NetworkManager
|
|
|
|
|
* clients can obtain to perform certain tasks on behalf of the current user.
|
|
|
|
|
**/
|
|
|
|
|
typedef enum {
|
|
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_NONE = 0,
|
|
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_ENABLE_DISABLE_NETWORK = 1,
|
|
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_ENABLE_DISABLE_WIFI = 2,
|
|
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_ENABLE_DISABLE_WWAN = 3,
|
|
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_ENABLE_DISABLE_WIMAX = 4,
|
|
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_SLEEP_WAKE = 5,
|
|
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_NETWORK_CONTROL = 6,
|
|
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_WIFI_SHARE_PROTECTED = 7,
|
|
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_WIFI_SHARE_OPEN = 8,
|
|
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_SETTINGS_MODIFY_SYSTEM = 9,
|
|
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_SETTINGS_MODIFY_OWN = 10,
|
|
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_SETTINGS_MODIFY_HOSTNAME = 11,
|
2016-06-01 12:54:05 +02:00
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_SETTINGS_MODIFY_GLOBAL_DNS = 12,
|
2016-05-30 15:42:44 +02:00
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_RELOAD = 13,
|
2016-08-17 15:34:55 +02:00
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_CHECKPOINT_ROLLBACK = 14,
|
2016-08-10 11:54:32 +02:00
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_ENABLE_DISABLE_STATISTICS = 15,
|
2017-08-09 15:21:28 +08:00
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_ENABLE_DISABLE_CONNECTIVITY_CHECK = 16,
|
2019-01-25 14:33:11 +08:00
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_WIFI_SCAN = 17,
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-25 14:33:11 +08:00
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_LAST = 17,
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
} NMClientPermission;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
|
* NMClientPermissionResult:
|
|
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_RESULT_UNKNOWN: unknown or no authorization
|
|
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_RESULT_YES: the permission is available
|
|
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_RESULT_AUTH: authorization is necessary before the
|
|
|
|
|
* permission is available
|
|
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_RESULT_NO: permission to perform the operation is
|
|
|
|
|
* denied by system policy
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* #NMClientPermissionResult values indicate what authorizations and permissions
|
|
|
|
|
* the user requires to obtain a given #NMClientPermission
|
|
|
|
|
**/
|
|
|
|
|
typedef enum {
|
|
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_RESULT_UNKNOWN = 0,
|
|
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_RESULT_YES,
|
|
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_RESULT_AUTH,
|
|
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_PERMISSION_RESULT_NO
|
|
|
|
|
} NMClientPermissionResult;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
|
* NMClientError:
|
2014-10-20 14:03:30 -04:00
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_ERROR_FAILED: unknown or unclassified error
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_ERROR_MANAGER_NOT_RUNNING: an operation that requires NetworkManager
|
|
|
|
|
* failed because NetworkManager is not running
|
2014-10-20 14:03:30 -04:00
|
|
|
* @NM_CLIENT_ERROR_OBJECT_CREATION_FAILED: NetworkManager claimed that an
|
|
|
|
|
* operation succeeded, but the object that was allegedly created (eg,
|
|
|
|
|
* #NMRemoteConnection, #NMActiveConnection) was apparently destroyed before
|
|
|
|
|
* #NMClient could create a representation of it.
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Describes errors that may result from operations involving a #NMClient.
|
2014-10-20 14:03:30 -04:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* D-Bus operations may also return errors from other domains, including
|
|
|
|
|
* #NMManagerError, #NMSettingsError, #NMAgentManagerError, and #NMConnectionError.
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
**/
|
|
|
|
|
typedef enum {
|
2014-10-20 14:03:30 -04:00
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_ERROR_FAILED = 0,
|
|
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_ERROR_MANAGER_NOT_RUNNING,
|
|
|
|
|
NM_CLIENT_ERROR_OBJECT_CREATION_FAILED,
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
} NMClientError;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define NM_CLIENT_ERROR nm_client_error_quark ()
|
|
|
|
|
GQuark nm_client_error_quark (void);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-10-25 11:11:12 +02:00
|
|
|
/* DNS stuff */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct NMDnsEntry NMDnsEntry;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_6
|
|
|
|
|
GType nm_dns_entry_get_type (void);
|
|
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_6
|
|
|
|
|
void nm_dns_entry_unref (NMDnsEntry *entry);
|
|
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_6
|
|
|
|
|
const char * nm_dns_entry_get_interface (NMDnsEntry *entry);
|
|
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_6
|
|
|
|
|
const char * const *nm_dns_entry_get_nameservers (NMDnsEntry *entry);
|
|
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_6
|
|
|
|
|
const char * const *nm_dns_entry_get_domains (NMDnsEntry *entry);
|
|
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_6
|
|
|
|
|
int nm_dns_entry_get_priority (NMDnsEntry *entry);
|
|
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_6
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean nm_dns_entry_get_vpn (NMDnsEntry *entry);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-05 09:36:32 +02:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
|
* NMClient:
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
libnm: hide NMClient struct from public headers and use direct private field
Having the NMClient/NMClientClass structs in the public header allows
the user to subclass these types. Subclassing this type was never
intended, nor is it supported, nor does it seem useful. Subclassing only
makes sense if the type has suitable hooks to extend the type in a
meaningful way. NMClient hasn't, and everybody trying to derive from
this class would better delegate the actions.
Also, having these structs in the public header prevents us from
embedding the private data in the object structure itself.
It has thus an runtime overhead and is less convenient for debugging (it's
hard to find the private data pointer in gdb).
Most importantly, there is no easy way to find the offset of the private
data fields, short of calling NM_CLIENT_GET_PRIVATE() -- which currently
is a macro. Later we want to generically lookup the offset of the
private data, we would need NM_CLIENT_GET_PRIVATE() as a function.
Instead, by having an internally, statically known offset, we can use
that offset instead.
Also drop all signal hooks. They are also not useful.
This is an ABI and API change, but of something that we never wanted to
be part of the ABI/API, and which hopefull nobody is using.
2019-10-18 07:44:31 +02:00
|
|
|
typedef struct _NMClientClass NMClientClass;
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GType nm_client_get_type (void);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-15 14:25:07 -04:00
|
|
|
NMClient *nm_client_new (GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void nm_client_new_async (GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncReadyCallback callback,
|
|
|
|
|
gpointer user_data);
|
|
|
|
|
NMClient *nm_client_new_finish (GAsyncResult *result,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-12 14:59:23 +02:00
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_22
|
|
|
|
|
GDBusConnection *nm_client_get_dbus_connection (NMClient *client);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-15 16:08:36 +02:00
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_22
|
|
|
|
|
const char *nm_client_get_dbus_name_owner (NMClient *client);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-09-18 16:11:00 -04:00
|
|
|
const char *nm_client_get_version (NMClient *client);
|
|
|
|
|
NMState nm_client_get_state (NMClient *client);
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_get_startup (NMClient *client);
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_get_nm_running (NMClient *client);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_networking_get_enabled (NMClient *client);
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_NM_DEPRECATED_SYNC_METHOD
|
2014-09-18 16:11:00 -04:00
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_networking_set_enabled (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean enabled,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_wireless_get_enabled (NMClient *client);
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_NM_DEPRECATED_SYNC_METHOD
|
2014-09-18 16:11:00 -04:00
|
|
|
void nm_client_wireless_set_enabled (NMClient *client, gboolean enabled);
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-09-18 16:11:00 -04:00
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_wireless_hardware_get_enabled (NMClient *client);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_wwan_get_enabled (NMClient *client);
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_NM_DEPRECATED_SYNC_METHOD
|
2014-09-18 16:11:00 -04:00
|
|
|
void nm_client_wwan_set_enabled (NMClient *client, gboolean enabled);
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-09-18 16:11:00 -04:00
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_wwan_hardware_get_enabled (NMClient *client);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_wimax_get_enabled (NMClient *client);
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_NM_DEPRECATED_SYNC_METHOD
|
2014-09-18 16:11:00 -04:00
|
|
|
void nm_client_wimax_set_enabled (NMClient *client, gboolean enabled);
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-09-18 16:11:00 -04:00
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_wimax_hardware_get_enabled (NMClient *client);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-17 23:08:44 +02:00
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_10
|
2017-08-09 15:21:28 +08:00
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_connectivity_check_get_available (NMClient *client);
|
2017-08-17 23:08:44 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_10
|
2017-08-09 15:21:28 +08:00
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_connectivity_check_get_enabled (NMClient *client);
|
2017-08-17 23:08:44 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_10
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
_NM_DEPRECATED_SYNC_METHOD
|
2017-08-09 15:21:28 +08:00
|
|
|
void nm_client_connectivity_check_set_enabled (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean enabled);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-07-22 15:55:15 +01:00
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_20
|
|
|
|
|
const char *nm_client_connectivity_check_get_uri (NMClient *client);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-04 16:48:39 +02:00
|
|
|
_NM_DEPRECATED_SYNC_METHOD
|
2014-09-18 16:11:00 -04:00
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_get_logging (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
char **level,
|
|
|
|
|
char **domains,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
2019-10-04 16:48:39 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_NM_DEPRECATED_SYNC_METHOD
|
2014-09-18 16:11:00 -04:00
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_set_logging (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
const char *level,
|
|
|
|
|
const char *domains,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMClientPermissionResult nm_client_get_permission_result (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
NMClientPermission permission);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMConnectivityState nm_client_get_connectivity (NMClient *client);
|
|
|
|
|
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
_NM_DEPRECATED_SYNC_METHOD
|
2019-10-02 17:19:33 +02:00
|
|
|
NM_DEPRECATED_IN_1_22
|
2014-09-18 16:11:00 -04:00
|
|
|
NMConnectivityState nm_client_check_connectivity (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-09-18 16:11:00 -04:00
|
|
|
void nm_client_check_connectivity_async (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncReadyCallback callback,
|
|
|
|
|
gpointer user_data);
|
|
|
|
|
NMConnectivityState nm_client_check_connectivity_finish (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncResult *result,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
|
|
|
|
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
_NM_DEPRECATED_SYNC_METHOD
|
2014-09-29 10:58:16 -04:00
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_save_hostname (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
const char *hostname,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-09-29 10:58:16 -04:00
|
|
|
void nm_client_save_hostname_async (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
const char *hostname,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncReadyCallback callback,
|
|
|
|
|
gpointer user_data);
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_save_hostname_finish (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncResult *result,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-09-18 16:11:00 -04:00
|
|
|
/* Devices */
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
const GPtrArray *nm_client_get_devices (NMClient *client);
|
2014-10-10 14:28:49 -05:00
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_2
|
|
|
|
|
const GPtrArray *nm_client_get_all_devices(NMClient *client);
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
NMDevice *nm_client_get_device_by_path (NMClient *client, const char *object_path);
|
|
|
|
|
NMDevice *nm_client_get_device_by_iface (NMClient *client, const char *iface);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-09-18 16:11:00 -04:00
|
|
|
/* Active Connections */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const GPtrArray *nm_client_get_active_connections (NMClient *client);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMActiveConnection *nm_client_get_primary_connection (NMClient *client);
|
|
|
|
|
NMActiveConnection *nm_client_get_activating_connection (NMClient *client);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-09-11 16:27:13 -04:00
|
|
|
void nm_client_activate_connection_async (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
NMConnection *connection,
|
|
|
|
|
NMDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
|
const char *specific_object,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncReadyCallback callback,
|
|
|
|
|
gpointer user_data);
|
|
|
|
|
NMActiveConnection *nm_client_activate_connection_finish (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncResult *result,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void nm_client_add_and_activate_connection_async (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
NMConnection *partial,
|
|
|
|
|
NMDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
|
const char *specific_object,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncReadyCallback callback,
|
|
|
|
|
gpointer user_data);
|
|
|
|
|
NMActiveConnection *nm_client_add_and_activate_connection_finish (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncResult *result,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-18 17:59:31 +01:00
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_16
|
all: return output dictionary from "AddAndActivate2"
Add a "a{sv}" output argument to "AddAndActivate2" D-Bus API.
"AddAndActivate2" replaces "AddAndActivate" with more options.
It also has a dictionary argument to be forward compatible so that we
hopefully won't need an "AddAndActivate3". However, it lacked a similar
output dictionary. Add it for future extensibility. I think this is
really to workaround a shortcoming of D-Bus, which does provide strong
typing and type information about its API, but does not allow to extend
an existing API in a backward compatible manner. So we either resort to
Method(), Method2(), Method3() variants, or a catch-all variant with a
generic "a{sv}" input/output argument.
In libnm, rename "nm_client_add_and_activate_connection_options()" to
"nm_client_add_and_activate_connection2()". I think libnm API should have
an obvious correspondence with D-Bus API. Or stated differently, if
"AddAndActivateOptions" would be a better name, then the D-Bus API should
be renamed. We should prefer one name over the other, but regardless
of which is preferred, the naming for D-Bus and libnm API should
correspond.
In this case, I do think that AddAndActivate2() is a better name than
AddAndActivateOptions(). Hence I rename the libnm API.
Also, unless necessary, let libnm still call "AddAndActivate" instead of
"AddAndActivate2". Our backward compatibility works the way that libnm
requires a server version at least as new as itself. As such, libnm
theoretically could assume that server version is new enough to support
"AddAndActivate2" and could always use the more powerful variant.
However, we don't need to break compatibility intentionally and for
little gain. Here, it's easy to let libnm also handle old server API, by
continuing to use "AddAndActivate" for nm_client_add_and_activate_connection().
Note that during package update, we don't restart the currently running
NetworkManager instance. In such a scenario, it can easily happen that
nmcli/libnm is newer than the server version. Let's try a bit harder
to not break that.
Changes as discussed in [1].
[1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/merge_requests/37#note_79876
2018-12-20 07:48:31 +01:00
|
|
|
void nm_client_add_and_activate_connection2 (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
NMConnection *partial,
|
|
|
|
|
NMDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
|
const char *specific_object,
|
|
|
|
|
GVariant *options,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncReadyCallback callback,
|
|
|
|
|
gpointer user_data);
|
2018-11-18 17:59:31 +01:00
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_16
|
all: return output dictionary from "AddAndActivate2"
Add a "a{sv}" output argument to "AddAndActivate2" D-Bus API.
"AddAndActivate2" replaces "AddAndActivate" with more options.
It also has a dictionary argument to be forward compatible so that we
hopefully won't need an "AddAndActivate3". However, it lacked a similar
output dictionary. Add it for future extensibility. I think this is
really to workaround a shortcoming of D-Bus, which does provide strong
typing and type information about its API, but does not allow to extend
an existing API in a backward compatible manner. So we either resort to
Method(), Method2(), Method3() variants, or a catch-all variant with a
generic "a{sv}" input/output argument.
In libnm, rename "nm_client_add_and_activate_connection_options()" to
"nm_client_add_and_activate_connection2()". I think libnm API should have
an obvious correspondence with D-Bus API. Or stated differently, if
"AddAndActivateOptions" would be a better name, then the D-Bus API should
be renamed. We should prefer one name over the other, but regardless
of which is preferred, the naming for D-Bus and libnm API should
correspond.
In this case, I do think that AddAndActivate2() is a better name than
AddAndActivateOptions(). Hence I rename the libnm API.
Also, unless necessary, let libnm still call "AddAndActivate" instead of
"AddAndActivate2". Our backward compatibility works the way that libnm
requires a server version at least as new as itself. As such, libnm
theoretically could assume that server version is new enough to support
"AddAndActivate2" and could always use the more powerful variant.
However, we don't need to break compatibility intentionally and for
little gain. Here, it's easy to let libnm also handle old server API, by
continuing to use "AddAndActivate" for nm_client_add_and_activate_connection().
Note that during package update, we don't restart the currently running
NetworkManager instance. In such a scenario, it can easily happen that
nmcli/libnm is newer than the server version. Let's try a bit harder
to not break that.
Changes as discussed in [1].
[1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/merge_requests/37#note_79876
2018-12-20 07:48:31 +01:00
|
|
|
NMActiveConnection *nm_client_add_and_activate_connection2_finish (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncResult *result,
|
|
|
|
|
GVariant **out_result,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
2018-10-26 13:44:38 +02:00
|
|
|
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
_NM_DEPRECATED_SYNC_METHOD
|
2014-09-11 16:27:13 -04:00
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_deactivate_connection (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
NMActiveConnection *active,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-09-11 16:27:13 -04:00
|
|
|
void nm_client_deactivate_connection_async (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
NMActiveConnection *active,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncReadyCallback callback,
|
|
|
|
|
gpointer user_data);
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_deactivate_connection_finish (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncResult *result,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2014-09-29 10:58:16 -04:00
|
|
|
/* Connections */
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-10-22 12:32:46 -04:00
|
|
|
const GPtrArray *nm_client_get_connections (NMClient *client);
|
2014-09-29 10:58:16 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NMRemoteConnection *nm_client_get_connection_by_id (NMClient *client, const char *id);
|
|
|
|
|
NMRemoteConnection *nm_client_get_connection_by_path (NMClient *client, const char *path);
|
|
|
|
|
NMRemoteConnection *nm_client_get_connection_by_uuid (NMClient *client, const char *uuid);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void nm_client_add_connection_async (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
NMConnection *connection,
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean save_to_disk,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncReadyCallback callback,
|
|
|
|
|
gpointer user_data);
|
|
|
|
|
NMRemoteConnection *nm_client_add_connection_finish (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncResult *result,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
|
|
|
|
|
core,libnm: add AddConnection2() D-Bus API to block autoconnect from the start
It should be possible to add a profile with autoconnect blocked form the
start. Update2() has a %NM_SETTINGS_UPDATE2_FLAG_BLOCK_AUTOCONNECT flag to
block autoconnect, and so we need something similar when adding a connection.
As the existing AddConnection() and AddConnectionUnsaved() API is not
extensible, add AddConnection2() that has flags and room for additional
arguments.
Then add and implement the new flag %NM_SETTINGS_ADD_CONNECTION2_FLAG_BLOCK_AUTOCONNECT
for AddConnection2().
Note that libnm's nm_client_add_connection2() API can completely replace
the existing nm_client_add_connection_async() call. In particular, it
will automatically prefer to call the D-Bus methods AddConnection() and
AddConnectionUnsaved(), in order to work with server versions older than
1.20. The purpose of this is that when upgrading the package, the
running NetworkManager might still be older than the installed libnm.
Anyway, so since nm_client_add_connection2_finish() also has a result
output, the caller needs to decide whether he cares about that result.
Hence it has an argument ignore_out_result, which allows to fallback to
the old API. One might argue that a caller who doesn't care about the
output results while still wanting to be backward compatible, should
itself choose to call nm_client_add_connection_async() or
nm_client_add_connection2(). But instead, it's more convenient if the
new function can fully replace the old one, so that the caller does not
need to switch which start/finish method to call.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677068
2019-07-09 15:22:01 +02:00
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_20
|
|
|
|
|
void nm_client_add_connection2 (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
GVariant *settings,
|
|
|
|
|
NMSettingsAddConnection2Flags flags,
|
|
|
|
|
GVariant *args,
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean ignore_out_result,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncReadyCallback callback,
|
|
|
|
|
gpointer user_data);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_20
|
|
|
|
|
NMRemoteConnection *nm_client_add_connection2_finish (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncResult *result,
|
|
|
|
|
GVariant **out_result,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
|
|
|
|
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
_NM_DEPRECATED_SYNC_METHOD
|
2014-09-29 10:58:16 -04:00
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_load_connections (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
char **filenames,
|
|
|
|
|
char ***failures,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-09-29 10:58:16 -04:00
|
|
|
void nm_client_load_connections_async (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
char **filenames,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncReadyCallback callback,
|
|
|
|
|
gpointer user_data);
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_load_connections_finish (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
char ***failures,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncResult *result,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
|
|
|
|
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
_NM_DEPRECATED_SYNC_METHOD
|
2014-09-29 10:58:16 -04:00
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_reload_connections (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
libnm: deprecate synchronous/blocking API in libnm
Note that D-Bus is fundamentally asynchronous. Doing blocking calls
on top of D-Bus is odd, especially for libnm's NMClient. That is because
NMClient essentially is a client-side cache of the objects from the D-Bus
interface. This cache should be filled exclusively by (asynchronous) D-Bus
events (PropertiesChanged). So, making a blocking D-Bus call means to wait
for a response and return it, while queuing all messages that are received
in the meantime.
Basically there are three ways how a synchronous API on NMClient could behave:
1) the call just calls g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). This means
that libnm sends a D-Bus request via GDBusConnection, and blockingly
waits for the response. All D-Bus messages that get received in the
meantime are queued in the GMainContext that belongs to NMClient.
That means, none of these D-Bus events are processed until we
iterate the GMainContext after the call returns. The effect is,
that NMClient (and all cached objects in there) are unaffected by
the D-Bus request.
Most of the synchronous API calls in libnm are of this kind.
The problem is that the strict ordering of D-Bus events gets
violated.
For some API this is not an immediate problem. Take for example
nm_device_wifi_request_scan(). The call merely blockingly tells
NetworkManager to start scanning, but since NetworkManager's D-Bus
API does not directly expose any state that tells whether we are
currently scanning, this out of order processing of the D-Bus
request is a small issue.
The problem is more obvious for nm_client_networking_set_enabled().
After calling it, NM_CLIENT_NETWORKING_ENABLED is still unaffected
and unchanged, because the PropertiesChanged signal from D-Bus
is not yet processed.
This means, while you make such a blocking call, NMClient's state
does not change. But usually you perform the synchronous call
to change some state. In this form, the blocking call is not useful,
because NMClient only changes the state after iterating the GMainContext,
and not after the blocking call returns.
2) like 1), but after making the blocking g_dbus_connection_call_sync(),
update the NMClient cache artificially. This is what
nm_manager_check_connectivity() does, to "fix" bgo#784629.
This also has the problem of out-of-order events, but it kinda
solves the problem of not changing the state during the blocking
call. But it does so by hacking the state of the cache. I think
this is really wrong because the state should only be updated from
the ordered stream of D-Bus messages (PropertiesChanged signal and
similar). When libnm decides to modify the state, there may be already
D-Bus messages queued that affect this very state.
3) instead of calling g_dbus_connection_call_sync(), use the
asynchronous g_dbus_connection_call(). If we would use a sepaate
GMainContext for all D-Bus related calls, we could ensure that
while we block for the response, we iterate that internal main context.
This might be nice, because all events are processed in order and
after the blocking call returns, the NMClient state is up to date.
The are problems however: current blocking API does not do this,
so it's a significant change in behavior. Also, it might be
unexpected to the user that during the blocking call the entire
content of NMClient's cache might change and all pointers to the
cache might be invalidated. Also, of course NMClient would invoke
signals for all the changes that happen.
Another problem is that this would be more effort to implement
and it involves a small performance overhead for all D-Bus related
calls (because we have to serialize all events in an internal
GMainContext first and then invoke them on the caller's context).
Also, if the users wants this behavior, they could implement it themself
by running libnm in their own GMainContext. Note that libnm might
have bugs to make that really working, but that should be fixed
instead of adding such synchrnous API behavior.
Read also [1], for why blocking calls are wrong.
[1] https://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/11/nonblocking/
So, all possible behaviors for synchronous API have severe behavioural
issues. Mark all this API as deprecated. Also, this serves the purpose of
identifying blocking D-Bus calls in libnm.
Note that "deprecated" here does not really mean that the API is going
to be removed. We don't break API. The user may:
- continue to use this API. It's deprecated, awkward and discouraged,
but if it works, by all means use it.
- use asynchronous API. That's the only sensible way to use D-Bus.
If libnm lacks a certain asynchronous counterpart, it should be
added.
- use GDBusConnection directly. There really isn't anything wrong
with D-Bus or GDBusConnection. This deprecated API is just a wrapper
around g_dbus_connection_call_sync(). You may call it directly
without feeling dirty.
---
The only other remainging API is the synchronous GInitable call for
NMClient. That is an entirely separate beast and not particularly
wrong (from an API point of view).
Note that synchronous API in NMSecretAgentOld, NMVpnPluginOld and
NMVpnServicePlugin as not deprecated here. These types are not part
of the D-Bus cache and while they have similar issues, it's less severe
because they have less state.
2019-09-04 13:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-09-29 10:58:16 -04:00
|
|
|
void nm_client_reload_connections_async (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncReadyCallback callback,
|
|
|
|
|
gpointer user_data);
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_reload_connections_finish (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncResult *result,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-10-25 11:11:12 +02:00
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_6
|
|
|
|
|
const char *nm_client_get_dns_mode (NMClient *client);
|
|
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_6
|
|
|
|
|
const char *nm_client_get_dns_rc_manager (NMClient *client);
|
|
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_6
|
|
|
|
|
const GPtrArray *nm_client_get_dns_configuration (NMClient *client);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-21 16:05:19 +02:00
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_12
|
|
|
|
|
const GPtrArray *nm_client_get_checkpoints (NMClient *client);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_12
|
2018-04-04 13:33:53 +02:00
|
|
|
void nm_client_checkpoint_create (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
const GPtrArray *devices,
|
|
|
|
|
guint32 rollback_timeout,
|
|
|
|
|
NMCheckpointCreateFlags flags,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncReadyCallback callback,
|
|
|
|
|
gpointer user_data);
|
2017-10-21 16:05:19 +02:00
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_12
|
|
|
|
|
NMCheckpoint *nm_client_checkpoint_create_finish (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncResult *result,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_12
|
2018-04-04 13:33:53 +02:00
|
|
|
void nm_client_checkpoint_destroy (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
const char *checkpoint_path,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncReadyCallback callback,
|
|
|
|
|
gpointer user_data);
|
2017-10-21 16:05:19 +02:00
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_12
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_checkpoint_destroy_finish (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncResult *result,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_12
|
2018-04-04 13:33:53 +02:00
|
|
|
void nm_client_checkpoint_rollback (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
const char *checkpoint_path,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncReadyCallback callback,
|
|
|
|
|
gpointer user_data);
|
2017-10-21 16:05:19 +02:00
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_12
|
|
|
|
|
GHashTable *nm_client_checkpoint_rollback_finish (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncResult *result,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
|
|
|
|
|
checkpoint: allow resetting the rollback timeout via D-Bus
This allows to adjust the timeout of an existing checkpoint.
The main usecase of checkpoints, is to have a fail-safe when
configuring the network remotely. By allowing to reset the timeout,
the user can perform a series of actions, and keep bumping the
timeout. That way, the entire series is still guarded by the same
checkpoint, but the user can start with short timeout, and
re-adjust the timeout as he goes along.
The libnm API only implements the async form (at least for now).
Sync methods are fundamentally wrong with D-Bus, and it's probably
not needed. Also, follow glib convenction, where the async form
doesn't have the _async name suffix. Also, accept a D-Bus path
as argument, not a NMCheckpoint instance. The libnm API should
not be more restricted than the underlying D-Bus API. It would
be cumbersome to require the user to lookup the NMCheckpoint
instance first, especially since libnm doesn't provide an efficient
or convenient lookup-by-path method. On the other hand, retrieving
the path from a NMCheckpoint instance is always possible.
2018-03-28 08:09:56 +02:00
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_12
|
|
|
|
|
void nm_client_checkpoint_adjust_rollback_timeout (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
const char *checkpoint_path,
|
|
|
|
|
guint32 add_timeout,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncReadyCallback callback,
|
|
|
|
|
gpointer user_data);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_12
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_checkpoint_adjust_rollback_timeout_finish (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncResult *result,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-05 15:19:33 +02:00
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_22
|
|
|
|
|
void nm_client_reload (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
NMManagerReloadFlags flags,
|
|
|
|
|
GCancellable *cancellable,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncReadyCallback callback,
|
|
|
|
|
gpointer user_data);
|
|
|
|
|
NM_AVAILABLE_IN_1_22
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean nm_client_reload_finish (NMClient *client,
|
|
|
|
|
GAsyncResult *result,
|
|
|
|
|
GError **error);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-24 08:53:33 -04:00
|
|
|
G_END_DECLS
|
|
|
|
|
|
all: fix up multiple-include-guard defines
Previously, src/nm-ip4-config.h, libnm/nm-ip4-config.h, and
libnm-glib/nm-ip4-config.h all used "NM_IP4_CONFIG_H" as an include
guard, which meant that nm-test-utils.h could not tell which of them
was being included (and so, eg, if you tried to include
nm-ip4-config.h in a libnm test, it would fail to compile because
nm-test-utils.h was referring to symbols in src/nm-ip4-config.h).
Fix this by changing the include guards in the non-API-stable parts of
the tree:
- libnm-glib/nm-ip4-config.h remains NM_IP4_CONFIG_H
- libnm/nm-ip4-config.h now uses __NM_IP4_CONFIG_H__
- src/nm-ip4-config.h now uses __NETWORKMANAGER_IP4_CONFIG_H__
And likewise for all other headers.
The two non-"nm"-prefixed headers, libnm/NetworkManager.h and
src/NetworkManagerUtils.h are now __NETWORKMANAGER_H__ and
__NETWORKMANAGER_UTILS_H__ respectively, which, while not entirely
consistent with the general scheme, do still mostly make sense in
isolation.
2014-08-13 14:10:11 -04:00
|
|
|
#endif /* __NM_CLIENT_H__ */
|
